Le 26 oct. 2006 à 20:31, Dean Jackson a écrit :
yes. Cf another comment about "CSS Selectors", where in your
reply, it is stated that Selectors is a transversal technology not
related to CSS 3.
That will have to be addressed at a higher level.
The rest of this issue is on hold once there will be more
clarifications on the outcome of WGs working on similar things.
Diversity is good if there is a common model which guarantee
interoperability. It is then unrelated to this thread.
Thanks Ian for taking the time to answer
Karl, does this mean you're no longer objecting? (Ian asks this
question below).
Dean
From
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/disposition-of-comments?
rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
Comment 14.
Summary: Request to allow any implementation mechanism for parsing.
Status: Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to proceed.
Thread:
http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/
0039.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Oct/
0077.html
CLOSED BY REVIEWER
and from
http://www.w3.org/2006/10/26-waf-minutes.html#item02
It seems that Ian closed already the issue before the WG.
Thanks.
Satisfied.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
