On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:49:51 +0100, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
4. Discussion of "Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST
when dealing with large numbers of URIs" and the subsequent follow-ups:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0327.html
I don't think that discussing this during the teleconference will be
productive use of the WG's time. I'd request everyone to study the draft
text and examples on this matter in
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#cross-site1
and raise questions on the list as appropriate. If we do want to discuss
this during the teleconference I'd like to hear what the goal of
discussing this during the teleconference is how likely it is that the
discussion will be minuted accurately.
5. Issue #20 (Client and Server model) discussion:
I have the same problems with this topic.
6. Issue #21 (What is the Security Model for the access-control spec?)
discussion:
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/21>
Is the text in the latest ED sufficient; if no, what is needed?
This question has been open for several weeks and I haven't seen any new
e-mails. Why does this qualify for teleconference time?
7. Issue #22 (The AC4CSR spec and "webarch"):
<http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/22>
Same concern as with 6.
8. Plan for next publication
It seems this should be much higher up in the agenda.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
