On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:10:15 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd rather we didn't require the slash. Otherwise, using this header wouldn't work with URLs of simple CGI scripts. For example:http://example.com/demo.cgiThis can support both being used as a GET or POST target, as well as being used with a path:http://example.com/demo.cgi/user/54 It would be sad to require people to say: http://example.com/demo.cgi/ ...in such cases.
For now the slash is not required but is used for comparison purposes. I suggest we leave it this way unless someone comes up with a viable scenario on what could go wrong given that there are use cases for the current solution as Ian indicated above.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
