Marcos,
Writing personally - not for I18N core
RFC3066 is referenced frequently - it has been superseded by RFC4646 and
it would be good idea to update the references in your document.
Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi i18n Core,
Please disregard the i18n model I proposed in my previous email. We
have spec'd out a new model [1] (based on model 2 proposed
previously). WAF would still be very interested in hearing your
thoughts on what we have come up with and also any thoughts you might
have about our configuration document format from an i18n perspective.
Kind regards,
Marcos
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#localizatio
----
David Clarke
