I'm in favor of this, personally. The W3C management might want a go at this. (Explicit +Doug, +Chris)
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tom White (MMA) <li...@midi.org> wrote: > Hello All, > > As you might imagine, many of the members of the MIDI > Mfrs Assoc are very interested in the new opportunities > that the Web MIDI API offers to users of MIDI products... > > Some are planning to offer new hardware and software > products designed to work with Web MIDI apps, and think > it would be useful to be have a logo that consumers can > use to identify products that are designed for the Web... > > Is it okay with the WG if the MMA comes up a "Web MIDI" > compatibility logo? > > Thanks, > > Tom White > MIDI Mfrs Assoc (MMA) > www.midi.org > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schep...@w3.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 11:59 AM > > To: public-audio@w3.org > > Cc: Chris Wilson; Joseph Berkovitz; Chris Lilley; Jussi > > Kalliokoski; Audio WG > > Subject: New Draft of Web MIDI Spec Published > > > > Hi, folks- > > > > I'm pleased to announce that the new working draft of the Web MIDI > > API > > WG has been published: > > > > http://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/4502 > > > > Regards- > > -Doug > > >
