Forwarding to the Audio WG since this relates to some of the output device discussions we've had recently.
. . . . . ...Joe *Joe Berkovitz* President *Noteflight LLC* 49R Day Street / Somerville, MA 02144 / USA phone: +1 978 314 6271 www.noteflight.com "Your music, everywhere" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Harald Alvestrand <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:36 PM Subject: Fwd: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> It was suggested to me that since this document deals with some IP address access issues, it should also have attention called to it on the WebRTC list. Here you are... -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Formalizing our permissions model using the Permissions API Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:41:28 +0000 Resent-From: [email protected] Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:40:55 +0100 From: Harald Alvestrand <[email protected]> <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]> I tried to think a bit about how I would formalize the permissions model we have designed for WebRTC in terms of the permissions API's permissions model. After a while, it seemed to make sense, and I'd like to share it to see if it makes sense to others. The Google doc is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13c4hTlm2XgVYpxfGL1a8fcvI1CAUdIgd662DfElk_ow/edit#heading=h.fb7kn49jp9ff Anyone with the link should be able to comment, if you want to comment off-list. The content is attached as PDF, which may be more accessible to some (and is certainly more archivable). Questions to ask: - Is this something worth doing? - If yes: Is this something that should be part of our core docs, a separate doc, part of the permissions doc, or in some "other" category? - Where did I go wrong? Comments welcome! Harald
WebRTCPermissions.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
