On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Joe Berkovitz <j...@noteflight.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I did miss the F2F so forgive me if I am missing something obvious -- > that's quite likely! > > We don't seem to have a comprehensive PR anywhere that amends the spec > examples to reflect tha latest Worklet thinking; instead we have a > discussion split between 3 open issues (777-779). The examples in those > issues do not completely line up either (for instance, 'fooNode' is a node > type in 777, but 'Foo' is used in 778). Furthermore the new examples seem > to have abandoned the Node vs. NodeProcessor nomenclature that we used to > have, so there is some confusion in my mind as to whether AudioWorkletNode > is the main-thread interface, or the audio-thread interface. > > I feel like it would be useful to unify all this stuff and try to have a > draft that pulls together all this material in a single place. Is there a > PR or branch in the pipeline that will do this? If not, I'd like to try to > pull one together. However I am nervous about getting out in front of the > implementation efforts that seem to be going on. > > What do the spec editors and group members think? > I have no objection to a PR or branch to put everything in place. I assume it wasn't done originally because this was the first time this new worklet approach was used so nothing was really ready for a PR until we got some agreement. I think we are mostly there, except for worklet item 3.
