> > Seeing as this is an existing limitation in the spec and we agree on the > direction we want to go, I don't think it should block the proposed API > changes so I've gone ahead and merged them now. >
Well, no - there used to be a constructor and now it's gone. At least add
an issue or something.
I'll work on some spec text for an opaque immutable list on Monday and
merge it - that brings us pack to parity and we can iterate from there.
Cheers,
-Shane
