> On Apr 16, 2015, at 10:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Erik Dahlström <e...@opera.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> forwarding on behalf of Eric Willigers, who found some inconsistencies in >> how the starting point and direction works in the motion path draft compared >> to svg2. In the definition of the motion-path[1] property the starting point >> and direction for circle and ellipse are different to the ones used for the >> equivalent paths in svg2, see [2][3]. In svg the equivalent path for circle >> and ellipse starts at 3 o'clock and proceeds clockwise. >> >> Is this going to be a possible cause of confusion, and should these >> definitions be aligned? >> >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/motion-1/#motion-path-property >> [2] https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/shapes.html#CircleElement >> [3] https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/shapes.html#EllipseElement > > Yeah, given Tav's work that established the starting point for shapes > is remarkably consistent across browsers, Motion Path should change to > start circle()/ellipse() at the 3 o'clock point.
Since 3 o’clock is implemented for stroke dash arrays already. I agree that motion path should change as well. Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJ >
