On 2015/10/09 7:51, Shane Stephens wrote:
Any thoughts?
This seems like a really good idea.
As an extra point - we don't need to solve custom animations (onsample
effects that modify the document) until L2, so we don't need to think
about this right now - but if we said that animations without a target
element belong to the document that the timeline they reference is
attached to then we might be able to deal with at least simple cases
here without resorting to exposing the map.
That's a good point. In future timelines won't necessarily be attached
to a document directly but we can probably define this association in
terms of the active document when the timeline was created or something
to that effect.
I'll go ahead and make the change to the spec.
Best regards,
Brian
