> > 1. There is the RDFa "about" attribute for that sort
> of use.
>
> noted, but on form submit that gets lost surely, of primary
> concern is
> to be able to use (and submit) typed names and values -
> this would be a
> huge time saver in a linked-data rdfa world and also allow
> for lots of
> nice functionality on the client side (form auto-completion
> etc).
>
> regardless of fondness of syntax, is it valid?
It's valid, as Philip Taylor noted.
I certainly like that better than holding session state data in <meta> tags,
which is what happens on now. I've always thought that linked data meta data
should be both displayed (not just exposed) and formally a Citation, a
reference to that which is written, (with style a separate issue).
>
> aside: perhaps for off-list discussion, are there other
> approaches?
If the 'form auto-completion' is the (correctly spelled and) qualified element
CURIE, I'm in :)
