To: the HTML Working Group
The TAG notes that the HTML Working Group is running a survey [1] regarding
the choice between two options for HTML extensibility, the options being
known informally as "like SVG" [2] and "zero edit" [3]. The TAG understands
that the survey specifically seeks responses from individual HTML WG
members, but we hope that our opinions expressed here may be of value in
any case.
The TAG and many of its individual members have in the past expressed
support for providing distributed extensibility not just for
application/xhtml+xml, but for the text/html serializations as well.
Furthermore, we continue to believe that maximizing compatibility between
these formats, I.e. supporting so-called "polyglot" documents, remains an
important goal.
On balance, the TAG believes that the "like SVG" option is superior to
"zero-edit", and we hope that it will be adopted by the HTML working group.
It is, of course, a compromise in a number of dimensions, but we feel that
it represents a significant positive and pragmatic step toward providing
the needed extensibility. We think the "like-SVG" proposal provides the
basis for distributed extensibility, with the additional benefit of placing
virtually all the burden of using the proposed mechanism on those who
choose to use it, since namespace-awareness is already necessary for SVG
and MathML.
We appreciate your consideration of our opinion, and indeed, we remain
grateful for the ongoing attention that the HTML WG has given to the TAG's
concerns regarding HTML5 extensibility.
Distributed extensibility is an important area for managing the evolution
of Web content. We understand that the details of how to accomplish this
are difficult, and that "like SVG" may be the best we can accomplish for
HTML at this time. However, we support continued, serious, additional W3C
work on distributed extensibility, independently of what can be
accomplished for HTML5 "last call".
Thank you very much.
Noah Mendelsohn
For the W3C Technical Architecture Group
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-41-objection-poll/results
[2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/extensionslikesvg
[3] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-41
P.S. An earlier copy of this note was sent to the [email protected]
mailing list, to which I apparently do not have write access. My apologies
to those who receive duplicate postings.
