On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Henri Sivonen wrote:

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 16:03 -0400, Yves Lafon wrote:
In http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/semantics.html#attr-html-manifest
linking to a manifest is done via an attribute and not using something
like
<link rel="appcache.manifest" href="<manifest-URI>">
The <link> based approach would allow better upgrade mechanism, if the
format of the manifest changes, for exemple.

[Disclaimer requested by the Chairs: This is not an official response
from the working group. This is my personal response.]

<link> doesn't work because of

<!DOCTYPE html>
<script src=script.js></script>
<!-- event loop spins -->
<link rel=appcache.manifest" href="manifest.manifest">

Well, there is an 'update()' call that triggers the application cache download process, and when called, is done after the event loop spins, so if it fails for <link>, it should also fail for a direct 'update' call, no?

--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras.

        ~~Yves


Reply via email to