On 13/12/2011, at 3:24 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-13 16:16, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote: >> >> On 13/12/2011, at 3:09 PM, mike amundsen wrote: >> >>> Based on repeated comments about what this issue of what the browser >>> user-agent *expects* as a return for PUT/DELETE, I wonder if things >>> would go better if the Prefer header proposal was included in all >>> this. >>> >>> mca >>> http://amundsen.com/blog/ >>> http://twitter.com@mamund >>> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me >>> >> >> Personally i don't agree with "Prefer" header but i stated this previously, >> as it is optional i just choose not to use it. >> >> If it satisfies concerns i have no problem referencing it as something >> people can use. > > Well, to make this "work", we'd need to define a Preference token, and > mandate that the browser sends it. > > Best regards, Julian
I have no objections to people using a Preference token if they wish, i don't think it requires to be mandatory for UAs. Thanks, Cam
