>I'm still not sure that the Neither! list is the right place for us to
>discuss this.
We can go private if you want -- if anyone on the list wishes to be kept
involved then they can yell out now.
The main purpose of my posts have been to inform you, Kerry, and anyone else
interested, that perhaps Pinker has something new and interesting to say --
the idea of an evolutionary psychology especially as he applies it to his
'Family Values' chapter, which cites lots of interesting studies.
I think your quote from Dawkins supports the view that "being determines
consciousness" is too simple. Nor is it in contradiction to Pinkers view
that science and morality ought to be clearly separated.
-- Bill
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
