>From the following reply I received from the CIB at Scotland Yard, I believe
"Neither" made a big mistake in not using the Port Arthur hand grenade to
blow the dictatorship out of the water.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your e-mail.
In November last year the Home Secretary told the House of Commons that the
review of the evidence surrounding the murder of WPC Fletcher was nearing
completion and he expected to receive a report as soon as was practicable
after the police enquiries were completed.
That remains the position.
Yours sincerely
WWW NSY
At 20:32 14/02/1999 +0800, you wrote:
>A bloke by the name of Joe Vialls (ex-UK, now resident in Australia) claims
to have been instrumental in re-opening the case of the shooting of
Policewoman Fletcher in London some years ago - for which Libya got the
blame then - due to new evidence he has presented to Scotland Yard. He
claims that once that case gets in to the public arena, that his new
evidence on the murders at Port Arthur in Tasmania (you know, the penal
colony where the "Poms" sent the naughty ones, back then) will blow the
Australian governments case out of the water too! Weeelll, the case was
closed with indecent haste which made a lot of us colonials a wee bit
suspicious. Anyway, I have spoken face to face with Joe Vialls about the
evidence he has, and it does sound very convincing.
>
>What I am very keen to know - if you do know and are willing to tell me of
course - is: is it true that the case of Policewoman Fletcher has, or will
be, re-opened due to new evidence supplied by Joe Vialls?
-----Original Message-----
From: David McMullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Public Neither list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, 19 February 1999 8:51 PM
Subject: FW: No God in the Preamble
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 11:42
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: No God in the Preamble
>
>
>A word of warning to religious leaders. If we end up with god in the
>preamble, it means that believers have breeched the unwritten rule that
>we "live and let live" on matters of religion. Such a preamble would
>generate a lot of annoyed, and in some cases very angry, non-believers
>who would feel entitled to retaliate. Any concern for respecting the
>religious feelings of believers could easily go out the window as
>non-believers found all sorts of imaginative ways to blaspheme and
>commit acts of sacrilege. You could also find that a lot of
>non-believers, who under normal conditions do not have the motivation,
>would suddenly feel the urge to get out there and argue their views.
>Given the fragility of many people's religious beliefs, the outcome of
>such a challenge would be a further reduction in the already declining
>number faithful.
>
>While religious leaders cannot be blamed for Ayatollah Howard's
>stupidity, they can justly be considered accomplices if they do not
>disown him.
>
>
>David McMullen
>1 Morven Ave
>Belgrave 3160
>9754 1819
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general
discussion.
>
>To unsubscribe click here
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
>To subscribe click here
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
>
>For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
>For archives
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
