At least I read Pilgers evidence. have you read Vialls evidence?
Just in case you missed the reply I received from the CIB at Scotland Yard,
here it is again, along with my original question:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your e-mail.
In November last year the Home Secretary told the House of Commons that the
review of the evidence surrounding the murder of WPC Fletcher was nearing
completion and he expected to receive a report as soon as was practicable
after the police enquiries were completed.
That remains the position.
Yours sincerely
WWW NSY
At 20:32 14/02/1999 +0800, you wrote:
A bloke by the name of Joe Vialls (ex-UK, now resident in Australia) claims
to have been instrumental in re-opening the case of the shooting of
Policewoman Fletcher in London some years ago - for which Libya got the
blame then - due to new evidence he has presented to Scotland Yard. He
claims that once that case gets in to the public arena, that his new
evidence on the murders at Port Arthur in Tasmania (you know, the penal
colony where the "Poms" sent the naughty ones, back then) will blow the
Australian governments case out of the water too! Weeelll, the case was
closed with indecent haste which made a lot of us colonials a wee bit
suspicious. Anyway, I have spoken face to face with Joe Vialls about the
evidence he has, and it does sound very convincing.
What I am very keen to know - if you do know and are willing to tell me of
course - is: is it true that the case of Policewoman Fletcher has, or will
be, re-opened due to new evidence supplied by Joe Vialls?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dion Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, 17 March 1999 8:22 AM
Subject: Pilger
>Omega wrote:
>
>"I forgot to supply Brian with some evidence of extreme-leftie-loony
>conspiracy theories. I am reading a book full of them at the moment: "
>Hidden Agendas" by John Pilger; Vintage; ISBN 0 099 74151 2."
>
>-----------------------------
>I've read Pilger's book and note that Pilger does present facts and
>arguments and evidence to help evaluate his theories or allow you to form
>your own. This is in contrast to claims like the one to the effect that
the
>Port Arthur massacre was staged to nobble the gunnies. (Evidence for that
>one: "Well it's obvious innit?")
>
>Dion Giles
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general
discussion.
>
>To unsubscribe click here
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
>To subscribe click here
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
>
>For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
>For archives
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
