|
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your e-mail. In November last year the Home Secretary told the House of Commons that the review of the evidence surrounding the murder of WPC Fletcher was nearing completion and he expected to receive a report as soon as was practicable after the police enquires were completed. That remains the position. Yours sincerely WWW NSY At 20:32 14/02/1999 +0800, you wrote: >A bloke by the name of Joe Vialls (ex-UK, now resident in Australia) claims to have been instrumental in re-opening the case of the shooting of Policewoman Fletcher in London some years ago - for which Libya got the blame then - due to new evidence he has presented to Scotland Yard. He claims that once that case gets in to the public arena, that his new evidence on the murders at Port Arthur in Tasmania (you know, the penal colony where the "Poms" sent the naughty ones, back then) will blow the Australian governments case out of the water too! Weeelll, the case was closed with indecent haste which made a lot of us colonials a wee bit suspicious. Anyway, I have spoken face to face with Joe Vialls about the evidence he has, and it does sound very convincing. > >What I am very keen to know - if you do know and are willing to tell me of course - is: is it true that the case of Policewoman Fletcher has, or will be, re-opened due to new evidence supplied by Joe Vialls? That bit above was correspondence between me and
New Scotland Yard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at the dates and times shown.
The lying Corporate Media - and Auntie -
recently put out the bullshit yarn by Cook - below is the truth of the
matter:
On 7 July 1999, Foreign Secretary Robin Cook
announced in the House of Commons that the Libyan Government "had accepted
general responsibility for Yvonne Fletchers death, expressed its deep regrets to
her mother, and paid compensation."
On 8 July 1999, the Libyan Ambassador-Designate
to London denied Cooks claim, telling Sir Teddy Taylor MP that his government
had made no such statement, and firmly denying Libyan involvement in Policewoman
Fetcher's murder on 17 April 1984.
The alleged "compensation" was a
misguided cheque provided by the Libyans at the express request of the British
Foreign and Commonwealth Office during late 1991, as "a gesture of good
faith".The "deep regrets" were personal condolences expressed to
Yvonne's mum by ordinary Libyan people when she visited a meeting in Tripoli
during 1994, and "responsibility" was: "Libya accepts
general responsibility for the behaviour of its diplomats inside its London
Embassy at the time of the shooting"
On the last point it should be noted that under
the Berne Convention, every nation on earth is responsible for the behaviour of
its Diplomats inside each and every one of its embassies at all
times.
A new investigation into Yvonne Fletcher's
murder was launched in 1998 and centres on fresh scientific evidence presented
by Joe Vialls, proving that Fetcher was murdered by a bullet fired from a nearby
American multinational building, not from the Libyan Embassy.
The investigation continues today under the
control of the Home Office and Metropolitan Police officials, despite
frantic left-wing political attempts to stop it.
There seems little doubt that Robin Cook's
statement was designed to quash growing public scepticism about Libyan
involvement in the downing of Pan Am 103 during 1998.
When investigators finally prove officially that
the Libyans were not responsible for Yvonne Fletcher's murder in London British
and American Government credibility over the fake charges on Pan Am 103 will be
destroyed This will leave unanswered the critical question of exactly who
ordered and carried out the murders of 270 citizens at Lockerbie in December
1988.
(Port Arthur is next...)
|
