----- Original Message ----- 
From: John Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 1999 12:03 PM
Subject: Further Strip-tease in the White House?


Economic Reform Australia
ERA EMAIL NETWORK

Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 
Organization: Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Further Strip-tease in the White House?

by William Krehm
Chairman, COMER
Editor-Publisher, Economic Reform
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is inevitable in the scheme of human affairs to commit errors, large
and small. But more important than the magnitude of the error, is its
openness to correction. Where we can learn from our mistakes, all is not
lost. It is when the error is backed by a powerful vested interest that
matters become really grim: the very extent of a policy failure becomes
closes the ranks of the imperial guard in its defence.

          Out of East Asia, the customary source of light, comes a
sermon on this theme. Over two years ago the East Asian Tigers -- long
held as paragons of the free market -- suffered a massive meltdown as
one currency after the other plunged, firms went bankrupt, and the
financial and industrial firms that were the very ikons of the
deregulated market were suddenly dunked in disaster.

          It required no great analysis to sense that more lay beneath
these disturbing developments than corruption and the creative
accountancy that the media highlighted. There was something clearly
amiss with the emergency advice that Western economists and statesmen
were ladling out. For years Washington had preached the lifting of all
restraints on the free flow of capital and on the resulting lurchings of
interest rates and currencies that this necessarily would bring about.
Yet now Washington and the international organisations were suddenly
whistling quite another tune in the deep dark. It pleaded with all
countries of the region, and above all China, to defend their currencies
to the bitter end.

          There were also appeals to the South Korean government to
extend its guarantee to the debt of the chaebols, the industrial
conglomerates. Once this happened, the chaebols' debt that international
banks held in massive quantity would come under the provision of the
Bank for International Settlements' Risk-Based Capital requirements that
declared debt guaranteed by governments of OECD countries risk-free.

          Something was amiss here on several counts. If the free market
were all-wise and the state the wasteful villain, how could the BIS** --
the private central bankers' club that doesn't allow anybody connected
with a government to attend its sessions -- recommend such guidelines in
the first place? And having done so, how could the governments that
imposed the failed policies end up twisting the arm of a distressed OECD
country to bend the rules to bail out the international banks at the
expense of the South Korean tax-payers?

          But the most damning truth about the mess surfaced when the
Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad uttered the unutterable --
that the Emperor himself, mighty Washington, had at no time, while
handing out such imperious bad advice, worn any clothes. What had passed
for wise policy was in fact a self-interested scam at the expense of the
less developed countries. That in other respects -- civil liberties,
accountancy -- Mahathir's regime leaves a few things to be desired, is
irrelevant. He gave voice to a burning resentment that extended
throughout much of the world.

          And what is more, his government proceeded to introduce
controls on capital movements, the greatest No-No in Washington's
hymnal. And on the first anniversary of that "experiment" Douglas Appell
wrote in The Wall Street Journal (1/9/99), "a recovering Malaysia has
confounded the critics who saw economic ruin in its unorthodox policy.
And it may continue to do so if controls becomes a theme in the
country's unfolding economic story, as some observers predict. 'If there
were another crisis further down the road, the hurdle is lower for
Malaysia to impose capital controls again,' says Raymond Lim, an
economist with ABN Amro Securities in Singapore. Officials won't rule
out that possibility. 'Nothing is carved in stone,' says Zainal Aznam
Yusof, an economic adviser on the government's National Economic Action
Council. The government must be ready to act again if a financial
meltdown threatens to inflict heavy costs on the Malaysian people,' he
says. Even the controversial 12-month lock-in period between September
and February was 'realistic' in light of the 'terrible uncertainties'
facing the country, Dr. Zainal says."

          "Government officials say they are in ho hurry to lift the peg
of 3.8 ringgit to the dollar announced last September, or the
capital-gains tax on short-term portfolio flows imposed from February.
Some fine-tuning is possible, but those controls may be in place for the
next two or three years, said Dr. Zainal."

          Reducing capital-gains taxes is one of the key prescriptions
of Wall St. for keeping the stock markets climbing. Apostasy could
hardly come in more extreme form.

          "Barring unexpected action by industrial nations to Malaysia's
call for a global 'financial architecture' that would safeguard the
interests of developing countries, some observers say Malaysia's
controls should be institutionalised. At a recent conference in Kuala
Lumpur, Paul Krugman, the MIT professor who last year endorsed capital
controls as a short-term policy option, said Malaysia's recovery is
strong enough to let the government declare victory and remove controls,
but the country should keep them in reserve if needed."

          "The recent report of 4.1% annualised growth in the April-June
quarter was proof of the economy's revival. And to those who point out
that more-orthodox neighbours such as South Korea and Thailand are
growing faster, officials counter that Malaysia suffered less social
trauma and avoided the dictates of the International Monetary Fund."

William Krehm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
** BIS = Bank for International Settlements

Copyright (C) 1999 COMER. 
May be reproduced with proper acknowledgement.

COMER Publications
Suite 107
245 Carlaw Avenue
Toronto ON M4M 2S6
Telephone (416) 466-2642
Fax 466-5827

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


*****************************
*  G'day from John Hermann  *
* Highbury, South Australia *
*****************************


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.

To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe

For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to