Dear Federal MPs, and others

The 'consequential' amendment of sec 126 was raised at the Australian's
Adelaide 'town meeting', where Malcolm Turnbull went 'deaf' and the audience
microphone went off!  This was subsequently suppressed, yet the Australian
is still inviting questions from those 'still confused' (including
apparently Malcolm Turnbull).

If, as an MP you voted for the proposed law, you may already know why the
'amended' sec 126 was added as a 'consequential' amendment', when acting and
deputy presidents are covered by the new sec 63.

If not, and you still voted for (or against) the amendment, please join us
and write to [EMAIL PROTECTED], asking how can the 'amended' sec 126
be a 'consequential' amendment' when acting and deputy presidents are
covered by the new sec 63?  If you do know why the 'amended' sec 126 was
added as a 'consequential' amendment', please let us all know, by telling
the Australian and Malcolm Turnbull.

Also add you might add other questions like why did the Late Professor G.
Clements (eminent UK QC and Emeritus Professor of law at Cambridge) sum up
our situation as follows?
"The continued usage of the Australian Constitution Act (UK) by the
Australian Governments and the judiciary is a confidence trick of monstrous
proportions played upon the Australian people with the intent of maintaining
power.  It remains an Act of the United Kingdom.  After joining the League
of Nations in 1919 Australia became a sovereign nation.   Authority over the
Australian Constitution Act lies not with the Australian government nor with
the Australian people, it rests solely with the UK.  Only they have the
authority to repeal this legislation...
I have heard some Australian politicians and indeed some members of the
academe, who should know a lot better, discussing how they could alter the
wording of the Australian Constitution to form the basis of a future
republic - what utter nonsense!".

May be in truth this not a politicians', but a bureaucrats' republic!  The
question remains whether these bureaucrats are incompetents, 'real'
republicans, and/or the PM's monarchist 'moles'?

Jim Stewart
ph:(07) 3397 4420 (Messagebank)
mob: 04 1427 4420 (voice-mail)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.

To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe

For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to