----- Original Message ----- From: OPC International <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Opsecrets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 2 November 1999 7:30 PM Subject: "Offshore & Privacy Secrets, November 2, 1999" > ================================================================ > >> "Offshore & Privacy Secrets, November 2, 1999" << > Published by OPC International > http://offshoreprofit.com > ================================================================ > > CONTENTS > > [1] Welcome! > [2] Feedback > [3] Commercial Sovereignty > [4] A Radical Tax Proposal > [5] From Latvia With Love > [6] NewsBriefs > > ================================================================ > [1] Welcome! > ================================================================ > > Welcome to the first edition for November - and of course a > special welcome to all our new subscribers. > > For those of you who saw "The Matrix" earlier in the year, it's > eerie how art/fiction can shine a light on reality. Sometimes, > when discussing such issues as tax and individual freedom with > other people, one gets the distinct impression that they cannot > "see" the whole picture. It's as if a very large percentage of > the population are truly brainwashed into thinking that the > government acts in their interest - and that tax is a perfectly > reasonable cost that we have to bear, in return for the "benefits" > bestowed on us by politicians. > > I'm convinced that 95% of the population are caught up in the > "matrix" - an illusion fostered by the powers that be (media, > politicians, educators) - which makes them "feel" they live in > a free country, while being forced to hand over 50%+ of their > life's effort. > > Not only that, but it affects us all. I often find myself > "reawakened" from a creeping somnambulant state by reading some- > thing new and challenging. Given a jolt - and reminded that even > though I think of myself as "enlightened" in this regard, it is > easy to be lulled into a false sense of security. > > I read two books during the week that gave me such a jolt, and I > thoroughly recommend them to anyone who is looking for inspiration > and ammunition in the fight against Big Brother. > > The titles are: "101 Things to do 'til the Revolution" and "Don't > Shoot the Bastards (Yet)" by Claire Woolfe. You can order them > at: http://offshoreprofit.com/educate-books.html > > I can assure you, that once you digest the contents you'll have > given yourself a good antidote to the "matrix". > > As always, > > Live free! > > Robert Smith > OPC International > http://offshoreprofit.com > > ================================================================ > [2] Feedback > ================================================================ > > We obviously stirred a few minds with the comments on anarchy > and limited government in last week's issue. One reader had this > to say about another reader's feedback: > > "Your reader needs to check his or her premises. If people are > intrinsically bad (his implication), then they cannot be trusted > (EVER!) with power over others. What you'd expect to see is that > the bad people are attracted to the concentration of power and > seize it for themselves...voila! You get exactly what we have. > > I also disagree with your 'limited government' philosophy. > Government is a legal concentration of coercive power. It is an > entity that has a growth imperative, and it is *impossible* to > chain it to strictly enforcing individual rights. The American > Experiment worked for a while, but is now an abysmal failure. > Once people sign onto the idea that some of their fellows should > have power over them and their neighbors, as night follows day > there will be a steady migration of that 'line,' that delineation > between what is permissible and impermissible. This is why Jefferson > clearly wrote of the time when corruption would infect our nation, > and why he hoped that day would be long in coming. It's here. > And this just proves to me that when the populace is educated > enough to be able to nurture and maintain a limited government, > it won't need one. This helps me to understand that Anarchy is to > freedom-loving persons as Utopia is to socialists. A destination > for a never-ending journey." > > COMMENT > The need for "government" of some kind (very limited) is brought > about by the need to have a system of objective justice - and a > system whereby we can delegate the administration of that justice. > It's a bit like having a referee. In a game of sport, all would > soon fall apart if the players fought over the rights or wrongs > of another player's actions. The referee keeps the game going > and applies the rules of the game objectively - to each side. > In life, others can do us an injustice - but everyone taking the > law into their own hands would soon result in continual gang > warfare. The ideal government is nothing but a referee. > > This does not mean, however, that the government must DO everything. > I can easily envisage private police, private courts and private > prisons. However, in a given territory there needs to be only one > set of laws - laws upheld by the police and courts. And if you > don't like the laws - then you should have the choice to go and > live somewhere else - a point brought up by another reader: > > "Following on your comments about limited government and anarchy, > I must say I don't defend any particular kind of government so > long as I have the choice to pick the one that I like. I'm not > into designing and building my own car, so I'm very pleased there > are plenty of makes and models to choose from. Therefore, the > only principle I will ever defend about governments, cars, or > anything else is that of the FREE MARKET. Because so long as there > is choice there is freedom. > > This idea connects directly with my comments a couple of weeks > ago about direct vs indirect action. If you don't like your > government, don't waste your energy trying to change it. Instead, > MOVE! I understand international relocation is not everybody's > cup of tea, and many people will put up with all sorts of > governmental abuse before even thinking about leaving their home > country. But if only they exercised their freedom to choose, just > like they do in the automotive sector, we might see a much more > competitive, consumer-oriented government market." > > Another reader wrote in to tell us of his personal experience of > bureaucracy gone mad: > > "Governmental interference in my life is getting intolerable. > This may seem as a silly example of what the government has no > power to do but it is extremely upsetting to me. > > I bought a house in town and own the property it sits on. I also > own a car that I bought to restore, a hobby, if you will. It is > not a bad looking car and looks better than many I see being driven. > However, if I don't keep it covered, it will be towed off. My > property on my property. And, police haven't any more right to > be on my property than I have on theirs but, every time the wind > blows the cover off, I get another sticker put on it. > > That is not the job of government, whether it be on the township, > city, county, state or federal. So, now I must spend my next days > off fighting city hall over a situation that would not exist if > not for the absolute ignorant-of-the-Constitution people in > government." > > And, finally, the sort of comment that keeps us going! > > "We just wanted to let you know that you make a difference in our > lives and the lives of many, so this is a thank you." > > Thanks for your feedback - it is always welcomed. > > ================================================================ > [3] Commercial Sovereignty > ================================================================ > > It may be hard to detect, but already there is some competition > arising between nation states. A New Zealand subscriber made > the following observation, "Australia intends to drop the > corporate tax rate to 30% within two years, and just this weekend > the New Zealand Treasurer indicated that his government (if re- > elected) will bring down the corporate rate to 30%" > > Big deal, you might say. But it does reflect a politician's grasp > of the new reality. In the case of Australia and New Zealand, the > fact that they are only 3 hours apart and share a common "open" > market, means that their respective tax rates need to be compet- > itive. If Australia lowers its corporate tax rate - and New Zealand > doesn't - then businesses will move to Australia and jobs will > be lost. > > This is just one example of the new reality in a global market. > As long as people and businesses are free to move to other > countries (and many are increasingly willing to), then even tired, > old politicians finally get the message. > > But this is just the beginning. As the internet economy grows, > and people create business links across national borders, there > will be more and more competitive pressure. It's obvious that the > European Union is very aware of this - which explains why it is > discussing such issues as "tax harmonization" - the idea that > they should all agree to apply (rig) the same tax rates, so they > don't "steal" businesses and people from each other. > > A pessimist may be inclined to see the EU idea as the way the > world is going. And it may be true that some nations will try > to band together and enter into "tax collusion" deals. > > But I'm an optimist and see a very different line of development. > > Certainly, some nations will tighten the screws - and try to > circumvent the operation of the free market, but other - perhaps > smaller, nations will see a unique opportunity. They will realize > that by offering tax breaks/concessions they can attract talented > individuals and profitable, job creating businesses. And once > these "entrepreneurial" nations start appearing, all hell will > break loose. > > It may start with traditional tax breaks - but I believe we'll > also see more nations offering residency and citizenship packages - > for economic reasons. > > As an individual, you will have the opportunity to "shop" around > for the best "government" deal on offer. You'll be able to consider > such things as communications infrastructure, law and order and > and your personal safety, commercial environment - and of course > the level of tax (if any). > > As trading blocks such as the EU put on more tax pressure, expect > other countries to seize the opportunity to become tax havens - > but not just by offering domicile to bank accounts and corporations, > but also residency and citizenship packages at attractive prices! > > It may even be feasible that we'll see the development of non- > territorial citizenships. It is not outside the bounds of possi- > bility that large global companies may become defacto "nations", > offering substantial "citizenship" rights to their people - rights > which are portable and applicable wherever their people may go. > > We're moving into a new millennium - and I believe that many > existing structures are in for a shakeup. And it is likely that > smaller, struggling nations will be at the forefront of such > radical changes. > > Once the idea of "competitive" governments gains ground, then > the more bureaucratic ones will ultimately have no choice but to > follow suit or fall behind. > > ================================================================ > [4] A Radical Tax Proposal > ================================================================ > > The essence of the "offshore" philosophy is that you can directly > control your own tax obligations by careful planning and the > application of privacy strategies. > > It is a response to the obvious waste of effort one can engage > in when trying to "change" the system. You have a choice, you > can spend 10 years of your precious life campaigning for lower > taxes - and fail miserably. Or you can spend 10 weeks educating > yourself on how you can personally minimize your tax - while > maximizing your freedom, and succeed. This is called direct > action - as previously discussed in this newsletter. > > However, it must be human nature - but there is always a constant > flow of people suggesting new tax initiatives - and launching > public information campaigns in the hope of winning support. > > You have the campaign for a sales tax to replace the income tax > in the USA. In Australia there is a campaign to introduce a "debit" > tax - which taxes the movement of monies out of the banking system. > You have the proponents of VAT/GST style taxes. And at the "lower" > end of the tax reform movement, you have those who are trying to > flatten tax and remove the progressive nature of tax scales. > > This is not new of course. History is replete with tax reformers. > One of the most famous in the US was probably Henry George. His > idea was that land should not be owned by individuals, but by the > state - and "leased" to the citizens. In other words, a land tax. > > Then there was Social Credit theory - as promoted by Major CH > Douglas in the UK and Commonwealth in the 30s. His tax ideas > were quite revolutionary - he was quite sure we could do away > with it entirely, and replace it with a national "dividend" - or > monetary payment to each and every citizen. > > It is interesting that the two latter ideas - by far the most > unusual - arose out of the era known as the "Great Depression". > Unusual times lead to unusual proposals. And we're approaching > "unusual" times again - particularly if the global economy goes > into a major recession. There is no doubt that if such a thing > occurs - then a chorus of voices will be raised, calling for > reforms to do with the money and tax systems. > > So, to get in quick, here's my humble contribution. This idea > is guaranteed to cause major arguments, and could even get you > tarred and feathered if you suggest it to anyone. So keep it to > yourself - or at least, amongst those of like mind. > > My idea is original - in that I came up with it myself, but no > doubt someone else has had a similar idea. I don't intend to > campaign for this idea, and have no illusions that it could ever > become a reality. I simply offer it as "fodder" for an after > dinner discussion when you're among freedom-loving friends! > > Okay, here it is: Make a change in the law that says only tax > payers can vote. > > By taxpayers, I mean those who earn their money and pay tax - > not those who receive tax money and pay tax on that. > > I'm sure you can see the ramifications. No politicians would be > able to vote (as their pay comes out of tax monies), no welfare > recipients would be able to vote (they are also tax receivers), > and no government workers would be able to vote (as their wages > all come out of the tax take). > > As you can see, this idea has grown out of the maxim: no taxation > without representation - but has been reversed: "no representation > without taxation"! > > Now, I'm quite sure that if ONLY tax payers were allowed to vote, > then the tax rate would come down drastically. > > Oh well, even hardened offshore advocates like me are allowed to > "dream" once in a while! > > ================================================================ > [5] From Latvia With Love > ================================================================ > > A couple of years ago, the Latvian government introduced a very > liberal banking legislation, announcing that they wanted Latvia > to become the "Switzerland of Northern Europe". Up to recently, > it seemed like Latvia was going to fulfill this promise - with > several progressive banks offering top notch Internet banking > services, while requiring only minimal identification, and of > course promising utmost banking secrecy. As a result, Latvia has > gained quite a reputation for being at the forefront of offshore > banking. > > This might change - and I'm not talking about Latvia's desire > to join the European Union. > > If some of the experiences we and some of our clients had to > endure with Latvian banks over the past few months are an indi- > cation of things to come, Latvia's success will be a thing > of the past at the speed of light. > > THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG > > There are indications that Parex Bank, Latvia's largest bank, > is infiltrated by the Mafia, with one Parex' highest executives > providing inside assistance to scamsters, thieves and other > criminals. To name just one recent example, Parex Bank provides > a safe haven for the "Safety Spar & Darlehenskasse" (SSD), which > is a fraudulent operation designed to rip off unsuspecting off- > shore investors. > > We were able to gain some insights on how this particular scam > operates; I'm quite sure that these fraudsters (SSD) operate > under many different names and that there are other quite similar > scams out there, so try to understand the patterns of this scam > and you'll be able to identify and avoid dozens of others as well. > > SSD pretends to be a "licensed banking company", claims to be > incorporated on the Isle of Sark, and offers anonymous and high- > yield bank accounts to the public. Apart from that, they "boast" > about being able to hack into the computer systems of various > law enforcement agencies, including Interpol and FBI. > > Their correspondent account details are as follows: > > --------------------------------------------------- > BANK: PAREX BANK, RIGA > SWIFT CODE: PARXLV22 > > ACCOUNT: > Account Name : Safety Spar & Darlenskas (SSD) LTD > Account # 000706357 > --------------------------------------------------- > > After several of our clients had sent substantial funds to > this bank account, only to never see them again, we demanded > an explanation from SSD. After weeks of strange excuses, we > directly contacted Mr. Pildegovis, the relationship manager > of Parex Bank - and were in for a big surprise. > > * First, Mr. Pildegovis denied that the account "000706357" > even existed. > > * Second, he said that Parex Bank's vice president had auth- > orized him to tell us that "Safety Spar & Darlenskas (SSD) > LTD" is *not* a client of Parex Bank. > > How could this have happened? Tens of thousands of dollars > successfully sent to an account which doesn't exist and whose > owner isn't even a client of the bank? > > We had our clients forward some faxed transfer confirmations; > only then did Mr. Pildegovis find the account - in his own words, > after a "thorough search". (Presumably Parex Bank's computers > were down for Y2K maintenance...?) > > The procedure he finally suggested to recover the stolen funds > was as follows: > > ------------------ > At the current stage we would advise You to act in accordance > to the legislation of Your jurisdiction. We will be able to > report further on the account in question only after receipt > of appropriate inquiry approved by the chief prosecutor of the > Republic of Latvia. > ------------------ > > Now, this is the very banking law which has enabled Latvia to > attract billions of dollars from all over the world - not > only from the Russian Mafia, but also from thousands of legiti- > mate companies and individuals from Western countries desiring > to save taxes and to protect their privacy and assets. > > So far, so good - but it doesn't stop here - not by a long shot! > > ANOTHER BIG SURPRISE > > Right from the start, we had asked Mr. Pildegovis to keep the > matter fully confidential, and chances are that he informed only > the highest bank executives. (He had previously honored this > request of confidentiality, and had been authorized by one of > the bank's highest officials - "by the bank's vice-president" - > to inform us that SSD is *not* a client of Parex Bank, and that > the account number does *not* exist.) > > Still, whenever we sent an email to Mr Pildegovis, we were sure > to receive an email from the *scammers* at SSD only a couple of > hours later, referencing the very email we had sent to Mr Pilde- > govis. > > Here's the most revealing example: > > ------------------ > From: SSD > > My associate contacted me urgently some hours ago, telling that > we have been warned by the bank where we have one of our accounts, > the bank that YOU know. Yes, we have a very high contact in this > bank :) He told us that you warned the bank about us. > ------------------ > > Here you have it - conclusive proof that Parex Bank is either > infiltrated by a hacker who reads all emails to bank employees > (and probably plays around with the account balances as well > in his spare time...) *or* by a fraudster at executive level > who assists these scammers in their illegal operations, among > them bank fraud, extortion and money laundering. > > TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT... > > There's more to say about this story, and there's more to say > about Latvia, but as we've run out of space for today's issue > let's finish this article with an urgent warning to prospective > offshore investors: > > Think twice before you do business with a "banking company" > having a correspondent account with Parex Bank, especially if > that banking company uses the name "Safety Spar & Darlehens- > kasse". As they are operating under a variety of names, it > might be wise to be careful with all "banking companies" > that have a correspondent account at Parex Bank. > > Needless to say, the account mentioned above is *still* active > and is *still* being used to receive and launder the proceeds > from extortion and bank fraud. > > If some of the Latvian law enforcement officials or some of the > international journalists on our list dare to take up this case, > the persons who are familiar with the details and who you should > have a chat with are as follows: > > 1) Mr Pildegovis (Relationship Manager at Parex Bank) > 2) The Vice President of Parex Bank (as of Oct 1999) > 3) Mr Mafia (hint: check out the employee who opened SSD's account) > > ================================================================ > [6] NewsBriefs > ================================================================ > > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32121,00.html > > No Deposit, Less Return - by Declan McCullagh > > WASHINGTON -- US currency should include tracking devices that > let the government tax private possession of dollar bills, a > Federal Reserve official says. > > The longer you hold currency without depositing it in a bank > account, the less that cash will be worth, according to a proposal > from Marvin Goodfriend, a senior vice president at the Federal > Reserve Bank of Richmond. > > In other words, greenbacks will get automatic expiration dates. > [snipped] > > This story is getting around.... > > From Y2K Newswire: http://www.y2knewswire.com > > Fed V.P. Wants Tracking Technology Embedded in U.S.Currency > > A Senior Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond > has now proposed that Americans be penalized for carrying cash, > that tracking information be recorded on every dollar, and that > perhaps the Fed should prevent Americans from withdrawing cash > altogether. Banker Paranoia has reached new heights... > > COMMENT > Just when you think you've heard everything - you discover you > haven't! > > What we have here is yet another proposal designed to counter > that most horrible of crimes - money laundering. And not only > that, but designed to also eliminate that last bastion of the > free market - what the government likes to call the "cash" > economy (or black market). > > By placing a discounting mechanism on cash - the idea is the make > you put it in the bank - where it can be TRACKED. The government > hates cash - and if it weren't for the fact that people actually > like cash, then they would have got rid of it years ago. > > If such a proposal gets the green light, then there is no doubt > that people will treat cash like hot coals - and want to get it > off their hands as quick as possible. This will either cause a > shopping frenzy - where everybody is forever shopping to get rid > of their cash - or a sudden surge in bank deposits. > > There is one further consequence that the sluggish minds in > government have not considered - and that is the arrival of an > alternative. For you can be sure that if the government (in its > wisdom) decided to make cash too "hot" to handle - then the free > market would come up with an alternative. > > Come to think of it, maybe we should encourage the government to > get on with this idea and do it! For then, we may finally see > the sort of shake up in the money system we all so desperately > need - the imminent arrival of private, encrypted, digital cash. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Source: Fox News > http://www.foxnews.com/news/wires2/1026/n_ap_1026_376.sml > > Overhaul of banking laws still faces challenge on privacy > By Marcy Gordon, Associated Press > > WASHINGTON (AP) Nifty new financial "supermarkets" offering > consumers more choices and cheaper prices? Or a Brave New World > invasion of privacy as banks and newly affiliated brokerages and > insurance companies share the data they've collected on their > customers? > > Backers and critics of widely supported legislation to overhaul > the Depression-era banking laws are offering those views of what > the nation's financial landscape would look like if it were > signed into law. > > In Los Angeles, Ulf Linberg, 50, had concerns Monday about sharing > of customers' data among affiliated financial companies, which > would be allowed under the legislation. > > "That would be terrible", he said. "There would be no privacy and > the people in this country really cherish their right to privacy." > > COMMENT > Orwell was right in his novel "1984". Language is a tool of > oppression when it gets into the wrong hands. Unfortunately, we > are well and truly bogged down in "newspeak". > > Take the word "privacy" for example. I don't think there has ever > been a time where there was so much privacy legislation - and so > little privacy! > > The above article bemoans the fact that merging financial services > with insurance companies (something that has already happened in > places other than the USA) will compromise privacy. > > But we're missing the point. We shouldn't be asking for more > privacy for the information on file - we should be reducing the > amount of information on file. What I mean is - instead of being > concerned about protecting our information which we have willingly > given out, we should be making a concerted effort NOT to be giving > out information. Privacy is about keeping private information to > yourself - not filling in endless forms, and then hoping that > privacy legislation will somehow "protect" your information. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPcap/1999-10/28/057r-102899-idx.html > > Tiny Island Shelters Huge Cash Flows > > By David S. Hilzenrath - Washington Post Staff Writer > > "The tiny Pacific island of Nauru has enjoyed extraordinary wealth > over the past few decades exploiting a precious natural resource > - fossilized bird droppings. But these phosphate deposits are > nearly depleted, and strip mining has turned most of the island's > eight square miles into an arid, pitted desolation. Now Nauru is > cultivating a new source of income. > > It is reinventing itself as an offshore banking center and selling > foreigners the means to cloak transactions. > > Over the past two years, tens of billions of dollars appear to > have flowed from Russia's troubled economy through banks and > other companies registered in Nauru, Russian and U.S. government > officials said. > > In 1998, $70 billion was transferred from Russian banks to accounts > of banks chartered in Nauru, primarily to evade taxes, Victor > Melnikov, deputy chairman of the Russian central bank, said in > an interview yesterday. > > A senior U.S. official said: "The central bank of Russia has come > to us and confirmed that large amounts of Russian capital are > flowing into and out of Nauru, and that has raised concerns on > their part and on ours and certainly raised suspicions." > > International authorities say Nauru is increasingly providing > cover for Russian organized crime." > > COMMENT > Here we go again - the demonizing of "offshore" by continually > associating it with Russian "gangsters". Articles like this are > coming out with increasing frequency - and indicate a pattern > of trying to make sure that the word "offshore" is associated > with the word "crime". > > A good antidote to this propaganda is to visualize your government > in one room and the Russian Mafia in another. Then try and work > out the moral difference between them. There isn't any. One is > "elected" and "legal" - the other is "unelected" and "illegal". > But as for their ACTIONS - they are identical! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.prnewswire.com/ > > ecount(TM) Technology Sets the Stage for Web-Wide Personal Spending Accounts > > PHILADELPHIA, Oct. 28 PRNewswire -- C/Base, a leader in e-commerce > innovation, has developed a new technology that combines, for the > first time in the online world, the convenience and manageability > of credit cards with the freedom and privacy of cash. Called > ecount(TM), the new technology sets the stage for truly Web-wide > personal spending accounts that can be used with all merchants > and all users on the Internet. > > Using established financial services and Web infrastructures, > ecount technology enables Internet users to conduct secure online > transactions through prepaid personal Web accounts. The patent- > pending ecount technology is the first of its kind to facilitate > person-to-person and person-to-merchant transactions of any type. > It was developed for all Internet users, including those unable or > unwilling to use credit cards, to transact online with unprecedented > convenience and security. > > COMMENT > Now, this may be just such an antidote for that idea of time- > discounting cash! Essentially, it appears it is a private cash > or "purse" account which can be funded by your normal credit > card. In other words, you make one "official" transaction (your > credit card into the "ecount") - and then you can spend the money > in this new account in complete privacy - not only between you > and various merchants - but between you and any other private > individual. Potentially, very good news. > > See: http://www.c-base.com/ecount/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Troops stand by for millennium chaos > > The Times, London October 28 1999 - BY MARK HENDERSON > > THE Armed Forces will be on standby to help the emergency services > over the millennium weekend, Jack Straw (the Home Secretary) > announced yesterday. > > Military commanders have been told to be ready to send men to > relieve police, firefighters and health workers if computer > breakdowns, bad weather or crowd congestion cause havoc in the > biggest national celebration since VE Day. > > COMMENT > Given that Mr Jack Straw is becoming notorious - this may be > even more ominous than it sounds. [Readers may recall in last > week's newsletter how he won the "Dead Liberties" Award, granted > to the individual or group who during the past 12 months has done > the most to damage individual freedom in Britain. He was awarded > this for his numerous policies designed to destroy the British > common law.] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Some interesting links: > > Omen of things to come? > > http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?&pn=US05878155__ > > Check out this new y2k test and fix at: > > http://209.245.48.174/distrib/IQtekInc-IMC/dl/IQfix2000-IMC.EXE > > ================================================================ > > "The ultimate consequence of protecting men from the results of > their own folly is to fill the world with fools." > > Herbert Spencer > > ================================================================ > See you next week! Please spread the message and forward this > newsletter in its entirety to related mailing lists, friends, > associates, and Webmasters. !! THANK YOU !! > ================================================================ > To subscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the following subject: subscribe opsecrets > - - - - - > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the following subject: unsubscribe opsecrets > ================================================================ > True Freedom CAN be yours at http://offshoreprofit.com > Copyright 1999, OPC International, Inc. > ================================================================ > >
