Specially note the bit about "TVeyes" - spEYES are for everyone, not just BB! ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 30 December 1999 8:49 PM Subject: "Offshore & Privacy Secrets, December 30, 1999" > ================================================================ > >> "Offshore & Privacy Secrets, December 30, 1999" << > Published by OPC International > http://offshoreprofit.com > ================================================================ > > CONTENTS > > [1] Welcome! > [2] Feedback > [3] Washington DC vs Silicon Valley > [4] Don't Leave it Too Late! > [5] NewsBriefs > [6] Secret #2: How To Make Money Offshore With $5,000 Or Less > [7] Quote of the Week > > ================================================================ > [1] Welcome! > ================================================================ > > Well, it's arrived - the last week, and the last issue of the > 1900s! > > Over the next few weeks, we'll all know what's in store for us > in the year 2000. We'll find out whether Y2K is a non-event, a > bump in the road, the end of the world as we know it - or any- > thing in between. > > Due to a technicality in the current calendar (there was no year > zero), the third millennium and 21st century don't start until > January 1st, 2001 - but this won't stop the year 2000 from being > called the Millennium Year, and becoming a year of utmost import- > ance. > > At the end of that year, we'll clearly see where the world is > headed - towards freedom or slavery, towards individual prosper- > ity or collective oppression. No matter what might or might not > happen over the course of this year, always remember that one > thing can never be taken from you - the *freedom* to *choose* > YOUR *attitude* in any given circumstances. > > Finally, it would be a great idea to set aside some time for > "New Year" resolutions. I trust that one of yours will be to > get a lot more active in protecting your assets and defending > your freedom! > > Keep in mind that "offshore" is not just a state of mind, but > also a powerful strategy for remaining free and for asserting > your inherent right to your own life. It's a practical strategy > for achieving freedom NOW - rather than just hoping for it to > arrive via the ballot box at some unspecified time in the future. > > Offshore strategies are "tools" of personal liberation, so I > have one New Year resolution I'd like to recommend to you - > give the Gift of Freedom and pass this newsletter on to at > least three other person who may appreciate it! > > Meanwhile, enjoy this week's newsletter - and, as usual... > > Live free! > > Robert Smith > OPC International > http://offshoreprofit.com > > ================================================================ > [2] Feedback > ================================================================ > > In response to our views on "voting" - we received this comment: > > "Let me concur with your revelation that voting is a scam. In > 1969 I was finally enlightened to the actual conspiracy, not the > communist conspiracy, the criminal conspiracy that controlled/s > communism. For the last 30 years I've done everything in my power > to help change the political scene. These last 30 years I've also > done my part to enlighten myself as to the working mechanisms of > the legal establishment. All to no avail. Then in 1996 when these > stupid amerikans voted in Clinton for another four years I went > down and unregistered to vote. ....I had run for County Auditor > and County Commissioner myself and saw first hand the dirty > tactics used on candidates by my own party let alone the > opposing party...." > > And on the same issue, we received this: > > "I agree with you wholeheartedly on the vote. I wrote a couple > of articles close to the same topic some time back. Too often > people believe that the simple act of voting makes them a 'good' > citizen when nothing could be further from the truth. Involvement > is the key, as is organizing people to cause changes. > > In further support, due to the amount of money necessary to > campaign, we actually have little choice as to who to vote for > which results in, as you stated, get one bad politician out and > replace him with another. I think it doesn't even matter which > major party is in power since those with the power to control > legislative votes, all benefit financially the same. And our > choices are extremely limited, case in point being the primaries > now going on." > > In response to the comments on "trusting" the trustee, we got this: > > "My comment on this is that I know of two different people who > are having trouble with their banker-trustee. In both cases there > is a conflict of interest in how the trust funds get invested. > First case: the banker wants the trust to buy 5%-6% bank CDs > which of course helps the bank but, with the stock market and > mutual funds doing what they've been doing for the last several > years, isn't really the best choice for the beneficiary. Second > case: a lady in her 90s who has a trust which manages all of her > assets and has fired her 5-year live-in nurse to replace her with > 3 shifts of nurses who work for a job-shop that the owner of the > bank has an interest in. It's costing the estate several times > as much money, but the banker is profiting from it. This last one > may go to court." > > COMMENT > Many jurisdictions provide for a "protector" - a person who watches > over the trustee - and has the power to change the trustee, should > there be a cause. In the case of the investment choice above, this > is a difficult one, as the trustee may very well be constrained > by a conservative investment strategy. And in the end, has the > responsibility to preserve the assets - not take too greater risk. > The second case is certainly more suspect. > > On the issue of free trade, we received this comment: > > "On globalism: Trade between firms across international boundaries > without government interference is beneficial for those firms > involved and arguably for the world economy in general. The > growing intercommunication between individuals across nation- > state dividing lines via the internet and other mediums is good > for developing political consciousness and economic market know- > ledge. But what should strike fear into any freedom-loving indi- > vidual is government implementation of globalism. The last thing > we need is another level of bureaucracy in the form of the EU, > NAFTA, and other trading blocks to tax us even more just to fund > the sharing of our private information between the member states > through a network of computer systems, machine readable passports, > etc. This could result in a monolithic world government, with one > inescapable worldwide tax regime, and absolute power through its > monopoly on the use of force. This is what makes globalism a scary > word -- because it generally refers not to a popular movement of > individuals or small business firms to trade freely, but to the > government-driven movement in order to obtain more control. Having > open borders and eliminating customs tariffs are nice short-term > benefits." > > COMMENT > Yes, one does need to make a big distinction between economic > globalism and political globalism. And certainly, we could expect > to see moves to "harmonize" tax regimes within certain regional > groupings. > > We got quite a lot of "response" to the issue of free trade this > week - but, due to space constraints, will hold them over until > next week. > > Further to a reader's complaint about a provider of ID cards, we > received this "counterbalancing" report: > > "After I received the ID card with the big red stamp, diagonally > across both the front & back of the card, I was very upset. I > wrote the supplier and was told that it was the LAW. > > I spoke with the person who supplied the link to the ID shop > and he told me to remove the outer sleeve because the stamp was > only on the sleeve and not on the card itself. > > It's a nice card." > > COMMENT > It just goes to show, there is often more to a "story" than at > first appears. > > And finally, an interesting piece from a reader: > > "I thought I would send along this quote from a book privately > published by an old friend of mine back in the 70s. He only > printed 500 and just gave them to personal friends so it is not > anywhere on the market for sale. > > LIBERTY CHECKLIST > > "Every group established for mutual survival and advantage risks > becoming a control mechanism and a liability to the very people > it is designed to serve. For this reason America's Founding > Fathers put such an emphasis on limiting government. There was > broad agreement that 'Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty'. > > It is useful, however, to have a clear idea of what one is to be > vigilant about if one is to be really effective as a watchdog of > one's liberty. To this end, the following checklist is offered. > There is no particular order and the priorities are unique to each > individual; they are simply items to scan periodically in assessing > the health of yourself and your group, a kind of index of liberty. > > Is free speech uncensored? Is independent thought discouraged? > Is differing opinion considered dissent? Is obedience honored > above reason? Is loyalty an issue? Is allegiance demanded? Is > there an exaggerated concern for enemies? Are your associations > brought into question? Is it imprudent to explore contacts outside > the group? Are there pejorative terms for outsiders? Are there > signs of intimidation? Is there an increasing use of force to get > things done? Do group members have access to their leaders? Is > there evidence of arrogance in office? Is it difficult to locate > responsive authorities? Is there excessive red tape? Is there an > open forum amongst members? Is there a free press? Are the channels > of communication manipulated? Are places of learning targets for > control? Are alternate systems examined and evaluated? Is travel > controlled or curtailed? Is currency or exchange regulated? Is > the individual increasingly subordinated to the group? Are certain > topics avoided? Is public debate or assembly discouraged? Is there > emphasis on the infallibility of the leader(s)? Is there an > 'official' history of the group? Are the means in harmony with > the espoused ends? Is it still fun to be a member? > > If we want to know the value of a group, a party, a nation; if > we are to assess its freedom and benevolence, let us not inquire > as to the might of its armies or the wealth of its resources -- > we will be better served to ask after the care it gives to its > individuals, the respect it nurtures for their rights; those > rights of property and of dissent which form the irreducible > basis supporting all the rest." > > Bruce Bishop - quoted verbatim from his book, "Liberty, Love & > Other Mislaid Notions" > > Thanks again for your feedback and comments - always appreciated! > > ================================================================ > [3] Washington DC vs Silicon Valley > ================================================================ > > Washington DC vs Silicon Valley: Who Shall Rule in the Decades > Ahead? - BY BILL FREZZA > > Look back at the 1990s and what do you see? A decade of unparal- > leled prosperity, broadly enjoyed more than any boom of the past. > A burst of entrepreneurial zeal unmatched in history. The smashing > of socialist dystopias and the discrediting of planned economies. > And a flowering of free market capitalism not seen since the > Industrial Revolution. > > Why? Because the engineers have sprinted ahead and the politicians > can't keep up. Behold the Internet. We built it and the world came, > creating a cornucopia of profoundly transforming products and > services. > > Behold the Clinton Administration and the 106th Congress. What > a sorry, unproductive, shameful, irrelevant bunch of windbags. > What good fortune that at this pivotal moment the feuding para- > sites have so thoroughly crippled each other that they've dealt > themselves out of the game. > > Look ahead into the next century. Two paths lie ahead. We can > continue to prosper, advance, and spread the blessings of tech- > nology and liberty to the darkest corners of the earth,leaving > the political class behind as the marginalized relic of a former > age. Or, we can let the politicians catch up, strangling the best > and the brightest with incessant redistributionist schemes, play- > ing one special interest off against another, all making common > cause with global bureaucrats trying to escape the decline of > national sovereignty by concocting a one-world government, the > final refuge of scoundrels who yearn to rule. > > Work hard for the former. Don't pay for the latter. > > Few concepts can be simpler. Yet our own industry leaders are > selling us out. In their lust for personal aggrandizement, some > of our most successful investors and entrepreneurs are turning > their fortunes over to the very parasites that would infect the > goose that lays the golden egg. > > One can only guess at their true motives, but in keeping with the > times they do have a Web site where you can witness their debase- > ment for yourself. It's http://www.technet.org, home page for the > Technology Network, a collection of millionaires with more money > than brains. Arguing for constructive engagement, TechNet provides > one-stop-shopping for Washington carpetbaggers out to separate > Silicon Valley fools from their money. > > Speaking of which, how is Microsoft responding to Washington's > divide-and-conquer agenda? By giving money to politicians. > Notwithstanding the outcome of the antitrust suit, and regardless > of your own personal views on this matter, Washington has already > won. Bill Gates opened his wallet, showering contributions on his > tormentors thinking they might leave him alone. > > Bill, don't be an imbecile. Stop writing checks. That's exactly > what your assailants want. The money you are funneling into the > political system is no different than the protection money the > Mafia demands from shopkeepers in return for not breaking their > windows. And, just like the Mafia, the politicians will never go > away. Your money will only whet their appetite for more. > > Oddly enough, it is the most cunning, ruthless, amoral industry > executives who have figured out that paying off politicians is a > fool's game. Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin has unilaterally decided > that his company will stop making soft-money contributions to > political parties. Was it because of his selfless devotion to > campaign finance reform? Was he wracked by pangs of conscience > over the perversion of democracy? No. He correctly figured he > wasn't getting his money's worth. You can buy as many politicians > as you want but they don't stay bought. In a system increasingly > mired in gridlock, that's a bad bargain. Better to just walk away. > > There is a valuable lesson here. We may not all be rich, but we > can all certainly walk away. Fewer than half the eligible voters > in this country participated in the last presidential election. > This is not a sign of apathy; it is a triumph of reason. If it > matters little which party prevails and your vote can't possibly > determine the outcome, how do you benefit by voting? If you are > a heartfelt supporter of a particular candidate, by all means > exercise your franchise. But holding your nose and picking the > lesser of tweedle dum and tweedle dee is an insult to the founders. > As we enter the first election year of the new century, it is far > better to focus on building a better future with your own two hands > than to squander your moral sanction by bestowing mandates on > leeches. > > COPYRIGHT CMP MEDIA 1999 > > Bill Frezza is a general partner at Adams Capital Management. > He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or www.acm.com. > > [reprinted with author's permission] > > ================================================================ > [4] Don't Leave it Too Late! > ================================================================ > > I often get asked the question, "What is the best way to protect > my assets?". And, as a reader of this newsletter, you should know > the answer - an irrevocable, discretionary offshore Trust. > > However, there's more to it than that. There's the issue of timing. > For, it's not enough to simply have your assets owned by a Trust. > What's equally important is "when" such ownership is arranged. > > For example: If you open this morning's mail to discover a letter > from a creditor who is threatening to sue you - then it's a little > late to suddenly pass over the ownership of your house to a trust. > > A court would rule that you were engaging in "fraudulent transfer", > ie - a transfer of assets with the intent to defraud a claimant - > and your trust strategy would be worthless. > > Or another example: If your wife/husband/partner says they are > leaving you - then you've left your run too late, if you think > you can protect any property you brought into the partnership at > that stage. > > All asset protection planning must take place BEFORE there is > a visible threat to your assets. And yet, most "asset protection" > occurs at exactly this "wrong" time. Most people only think of > asset protection when the knock comes at the door, so to speak. > > Asset protection is like insurance. > > You won't be able to get any fire insurance - AFTER your house > has caught fire. You won't be able to get any car theft insurance > - AFTER your car has been stolen. > > And it's the same with asset protection. You won't be able to > protect your assets with a trust - AFTER a challenge to those > assets is already underway. > > It's one of our unfortunate "human" traits, in that we seek pro- > tection from a threat - AFTER the threat has appeared. > > So don't leave your asset protection planning until it's too late. > If you have substantial assets - then you need protection. And > the time to plan - is when you think there is no need to plan. > > In other words - NOW. > > ================================================================ > [5] NewsBriefs > ================================================================ > > http://www.teledotcom.com/424/news/tdc424na_echelon.html > > Spy System Gets Unwrapped > > If the worst thing for a multinational spying system is publicity, > there are probably a lot of long faces these days at the National > Security Agency headquarters in Fort Meade, Md. > > Suddenly, its five-country super-secret snooping outfit, Project > Echelon, is getting as much attention as Ricky Martin and Pokemon. > > The long-rumored project, said to be a cooperative effort between > the NSA and its counterparts in Canada, the United Kingdom, > Australia and New Zealand, intercepts as many as 2 million e-mails > per hour and eavesdrops on cell phone, fax and wireline communi- > cations at similar rates, experts say. > > The total per-day intercepts? An estimated 3 billion messages. > [snipped] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Become your own NSA Agent! > > Secret technologies like real-time voice recognition and keyword > filtering have been jealously guarded by intelligence agencies > for many years. No more! Now you can beat the NSA at their own > game and scan dozens of TV channels for words defined by - you! > You'll be notified via email in real-time whenever your target > word is spoken. > > Sounds incredible? Check it out at http://www.TVEyes.com/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > The End of Ordinary Money - by J. Orlin Grabbe > > Late one night while sharing a pharmacological product with a > spook I met in the northeastern part of the United States, I > mentioned I was studying cryptology. > > "Cryptology is the future," he responded emphatically. "It's > what's going to protect us from Big Brother." > > Since he worked for the National Security Agency (NSA), the thought > did occur to me that many would have taken the position that he > and his colleagues were Big Brother. But I had learned years ago > not to demonize people on the basis of an accidental profession. > After all, if an ex-CIA employee like Kerry Thornley could become > a staunch libertarian, the creator of Zenarchy and implied co- > author of the Erisian holy book Principia Discordia, then there > was hope for all of us. I additionally believed that one of our > best defenses against the national security state was the perennial > proclivity of clandestine organizations to piss off their own > employees. [snipped] > > Read the rest of this fascinating article at: > http://www.zolatimes.com/aGrabbeMoney1.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > IRS Collections Actions Drop $1.3B > > By CURT ANDERSON - AP Tax Writer > > WASHINGTON (AP) - The Internal Revenue Service collected $1.3 > billion less over the past year through enforcement actions such > as property seizures and liens, a trend top agency officials say > must be stopped. > > `We really don't want it to go down any more than it has,' IRS > Commissioner Charles Rossotti said in a recent interview. 'We're > trying to keep the ship afloat.' > > A combination of fewer agents and new laws giving taxpayers broad > new rights has led to the reduction, which IRS officials say > threatens to undermine the integrity of the tax system. [snipped] > > COMMENT > Well, you gotta hear some good news once in a while - and I > strongly suspect that this is just the beginning! If the IRS > is going to be as seriously damaged by Y2K as many insiders > anticipate, how many people will continue paying them "taxes" > (extortion money)? And it's about time! Remember that it all > started with a 1% income tax - and take a look at where we're > now! RIP, and welcome to the scrap-yard of history! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://linuxtoday.com/stories/13652.html > > Richard Stallman -- Boycott Amazon! > > Please do not buy from Amazon. > > Amazon has obtained a US patent (5,960,411) on an important and > obvious idea for E-commerce: the idea that your command in a web > browser to buy a certain item can carry along information about > your identity. (This works by sending back a "cookie", a kind of > ID code that your browser received previously from the same server.) > Amazon has sued to block the use of this simple idea, showing that > they truly intend to monopolize it. This is an attack against the > World Wide Web and against E-commerce in general. [snipped] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.libertarium.ru/eng/index.html > > Creating a Russian Freedom Party > > "Moscow Libertarium is aimed at information support of public > activities and scientific research in the areas of libertarianism > and libertarian thought. Since June 1998 we are concentrating our > efforts on practical solutions and recipes for emerging law and > economy in computerized environment." > > "When we get more than 1000 persons interested in the creation > of the political party, we will undertake practical efforts to > register libertarian party under the Russian law. In the meantime > we are putting together texts suitable for the creation of a > Freedom Party program." > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,33225,00.html > > Lawsuit Says Feds Went too Far - by Jill Priluck > > NEW YORK -- The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the federal > government for allegedly coercing an artist and Web hosting service > to censor a fictional depiction of a Y2K military takeover. > > The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in US District Court in New Jersey, > accuses the FBI, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New > York, and the US Department of Justice of illegally shutting down > artist Mike Zieper's video, Military Takeover of New York City, > which is about a New Year's Eve military coup in Times Square. > > According to the lawsuit, the Feds violated Zieper's right to free > speech by pressuring the artist and his Web host, Mark Weiger, to > remove the video. ACLU attorney Ann Beeson called it an egregious > First Amendment violation. [snipped] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Bear or Bull in early 2000? > > "The gap between most stocks... and the leading indexes is the > largest it has ever been. History tells us that the gap is event- > ually closed when the indexes collapse. That is what happened in > '29 and '73. > > But the gap could also be closed by a new, huge, broad-based bull > market. That is what most investors expect -- a "melt-up" in > January as the Y2k fears pass, and the Y2k cash, so generously > provided by Big-hearted, St. Alan Greenspan, gets taken out of > mattresses and safe deposit boxes and put into stocks." > > Source: The Daily Reckoning: http://www.dailyreckoning.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Caymans Banks All Compliant > > In the largest of the Caribbean offshore banking centers, the > Cayman Islands, officials said they are ready for Y2K. The British > colony in the western Caribbean, with just 36,000 people, lays > claim to being the world's fifth largest financial center with > more than 41,000 registered companies. > > "All our members are compliant", said Eduardo D'Angelo Silva, > president of the Cayman Islands Bankers Association representing > the 592 registered banks and financial institutions in the > territory. > > Clearinghouse banks, Scotiabank, Royal Bank of Canada, CIBC, > British American Bank, Bank of Butterfield, Cayman National and > Barclays, all have been working together and with their home > offices to prepare for the New Year. Most of those banks do > business across the Caribbean. > > "Customers should not feel at risk for their funds," said Wayne > Robb, operations manager for Scotiabank. "Y2K is not going to > wipe out the records of anyone's account." [snipped] > > Source: http://www.msnbc.com/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Petition against taxing the internet > > Organized by WorldNetDaily > > "Whereas, the Internet has resulted in the freest exchange of > ideas, information, goods and services among the peoples of the > world in history, and We, the People, do hereby Petition our > elected representatives to preserve Internet freedom and, do > hereby oppose all attempts to tax or otherwise regulate Internet > commerce. > > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/petition/dont_tax_internet.php3 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > http://www.smh.com.au/news/9912/24/world/world1.html > > Globe on alert for New Year terror - By BEN FENTON in Washington > > Governments around the world have put police and military forces > on alert and put tightened security checks at airports and other > installations as fears mount of millennium terrorist attacks and > disorder. > > Wrapped gifts were banned at United States airports on Wednesday, > and queues lengthened at security gates in all major US air > terminals as authorities imposed stricter checks than usual. > > The British Home Secretary, Mr Jack Straw, announced that all > police leave had been canceled, troops would be on standby with > some units ready to move at 10 minutes' notice, and 32 emergency > patrol boats would be deployed on the Thames. Up to 2 million > people are expected to visit London for New Year. > > In New York, where up to 2 million people are expected around > Times Square, officials said bomb-sniffing dogs would patrol > tunnels beneath the streets, workers who need to traverse the > side streets around the square would be required to have passes, > and 7,000 uniformed and undercover police officers would mingle > with crowds, a duty usually handled by 4,800 officers. [snipped] > > COMMENT > My personal recommendation is to avoid large crowds over the > coming week, no matter where you are, but especially if you're > here in the US. If you do need large crowds to celebrate some- > thing, why not wait to welcome the New Millennium when it > actually begins - on January 1, 2001! > > ================================================================ > [6] Secret #2: How To Make Money Offshore With $5,000 Or Less > ================================================================ > > We often receive messages like the following: > > "Your offers are great, but how can I actually make money > offshore if I have less than $5,000 to start with?" > > For this reason we've decided to start a new series consisting > of the Top Ten Secrets to make money offshore if you have less > than $5,000 to start with. Today we'll continue with Tip #2; > additional tips will be published over the course of the coming > year. > > "HOW TO MAKE MONEY OFFSHORE WITH $5,000 OR LESS" > > SECRET #2 > > Buy gold. It's as simple as that. We strongly expect that gold > will significantly increase in value over the coming months, > maybe as early as next week! > > The best way to buy gold (even if you just have $100 to spare) > is to open an account at e-gold and store your gold there. > Alternatively, you can have them ship it to you whenever you > desire. > > Open your e-gold account now: > > http://www.e-gold.com/e-gold.asp?cid=100967 > > ** If you send them a Western Union transfer today, you can > have gold in your account before Y2K! ** > > ================================================================ > [7] Quote of the Week > ================================================================ > > "In the name of the best within you, do not sacrifice this world > to those who are its worst. In the name of the values that keep > you alive, do not let your vision of man be distorted by the ugly, > the cowardly, the mindless in those who have never achieved his > title. Do not lose your knowledge that man's proper estate is an > upright posture, an intransigent mind and a step that travels > unlimited roads. Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable > spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, > the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in our soul perish, > in the lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never > been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. > The world you desired can be won, it exists, it is real, it is > possible, it's yours." > > Ayn Rand - from John Galt's speech in "Atlas Shrugged" > > [If you haven't read this book - then make reading it YOUR New > Year Resolution!] > > ================================================================ > See you next week! Please spread the message and forward this > newsletter in its entirety to friends, associates, and others > who might benefit from it! !! THANK YOU !! > ================================================================ > Need a private email address to receive this newsletter? > Sign up now for FREE: http://freedomflash.com > ================================================================ > To subscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================================ > "Protect your life and assets by going > offshore - the libertarian way." > ================================================================ > http://offshoreprofit.com > Copyright 1999, OPC International, Inc. > ================================================================ > > > > > > > > ======================================================================= > OPC International http://offshoreprofit.com +81-675-001-697 > ======================================================================= > Protect your life and assets by going offshore - the libertarian way. > ======================================================================= > Get a Free, Private & Confidential Email Address! > Freedom Flash Mail: http://freedomflash.com > ======================================================================= > ++ TOMORROW's MONEY ++ > http://e-gold.com/e-gold.asp?cid=100967 > ======================================================================= > > > > > _____________________________________________________________ > Get your favorite topic delivered daily. > http://www.topica.com/t/11
