I have been writing about and against The Murphy Myth for several months.
This protrays Australia as having no legal government and therefore there
is no reason to pay taxes. I have now completed a 25 x A4 page analysis of
this farce. It is available in Adobe Acrobat Format; if you email me and
request it I will send a copy free of charge.
In court cases in the State Supreme Courts, the Federal Court and the High
Courts the argument has been continually, unanimously and totally rejected;
whatever else it may be it is not the law of Australia. My analysis shows
clearly and indisputably that all of The Murphy Myth arguments have now
been dismissed by the Australian courts. Whatever else, there is no doubt
that to use any of these arguments in Australian courts can only bring a
single outcome - UTTER FAILURE!
Why then are several groups continuing to push this Myth and to take money
of people saying that they will represent them in the Australian Courts
with this argument ? The Australian Courts have stated the following,
�The submissions are apparently derived from an unidentified group of
persons who, perhaps for personal gain, encourage others to present such
arguments to bureaucrats and the courts ... The submissions well merit the
term �groundless�.... . The problem would be, to say the least, even more
serious were a solicitor or barrister to participate in advertising to
persons with potential income tax liabilities that advice was available
how to escape those liabilities upon payment of a fee which then
encouraged the making of arguments before courts which were bound to fail
" (The Queensland Supreme Court(Walsh) and Federal Court (Levick)).
If you know of any people that are attempting to defer a tax liability on
the basis of the Murphy argument please inform them they MUST FAIL. Any
other outcome would be the legal equivalent of defying gravity!
If you want to believe the Murphy Myth that is fine. But noone can believe
you can succeed in an Australian Court with it after having read the cases.
The following are the cases that totally reject all of the laws of The
Murphy Myth.
1. Professional Nominees P/L v Walsh & Anor
[1998] QCA 296 (29 September 1998)
2. Joosse v Australian Securities and Investment Commission
[1998] HCA 77 21 December 1998
3. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Levick
[1999] FCA 1580 (1 December 1999)
4. Helljay Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[1999] HCA 56
5. Kevjen Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Supreme Court of Queensland , 4 th August 1999, No S 6694 of 1999
6. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hoperidge Pty Ltd
Supreme Court of Queensland , 28 July 1999, No S 5876 of 1999
If someone reads these cases and tell you otherwise he is either a liar, an
idiot or a CON-ARTIST.
KKerry Spencer-Salt B.E., LL.B (Hons)
Funancials Pty Ltd A.C.N. No. 058 865 900
TRADING AS
Australian Community Organisation Publications
P.O. Box 136, Surry Hills NSW 2010
Phone : (02) 9360 0610
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website : www.rockroll.com.au/watchman
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion.
To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe
To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe
For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm
For archives
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
