News Report Issue 66
Index
 
1. Thought for the day - Tom
2. Request:
3. Opinion: The acceptance of obscene language - Antonia
4. Opinion: Building and using internet communities to win in politics - Richard
5. Opinion: The forgotten Christian holocaust - Antonia
6. Opinion: A tribute to a gutsy lady - Antonia
7. Opinion: GST Business Destruction starts - Lindsay
8. Life Sciences: a) Global boom in organics - Forwarded by John
8. Life Sciences: b) Quotation: Dr. Michael Antoniou - Sn. Lecturer in Molecular pathology.
9. Feedback: NZ petrol prices and Oil companies - Hamish / Dave
10. Feedback: Australia & Guns - Philip Madsen
11. Feedback: Free Trade? - Kerry
12. Feedback: GMO's & Telstra
13. Feedback Contacts:
14. Editorial Policy:
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
1. Thought for the day:
 
"The problem with power is .....how to get men of power to live for the public, rather than off the public ." (Robert F.Kennedy
 
Forwarded by Tom Ruut.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
2. Request:
For this online news report to be ultimately effective it must grow to such a size that it and the ideas it espouses can't be ignored. So do your bit and help circulate it far and wide. If we are to challenge the elites (the Packers and the Murdochs) view of history, politics, economics, the environment, the structure of society etc., then we are going to have to do more than wait. We are going to have to be very active and vigilant. We have given you one of the tools (information & a medium for comment) you will need. Help us to help you. Lets fan the flames of knowledge. Spread the word. Editor.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
3. Opinion:
 The acceptance of obscene language

Last week, radio host Alan Jones informed his listeners that a female Queensland Industrial Relations Commissioner found that a Cairns Big W store had breached the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act by sacking an employee who called the boss a f+++wit. She said that while "inappropriate", such behaviour was not like attacking someone, and ordered Big W to pay the sacked worker four months salary, about nine thousand dollars.

In unfortunate English Jones said, "Prior to calling his boss an f-wit and swearing at other colleagues, a female representative allegedly said that the employee called her a dumb, fat, stupid bitch" (13 / 3 / 00). Even after evidence of such brutishness, the commissioner determined people must put up with such appalling behaviour by their workmates.

But it's not just the law that's an ass. Academics give judges a run for their money. Like the commissioner, a University of Queensland linguistics expert, Professor Roland Sussex, said people have to accept obscenity as part of everyday life. Why? Only because the likes of him and out-of-touch commissioners say so!

OK, if these clowns think swearing is acceptable behaviour, perhaps people should start swearing at them. While it would be difficult for properly brought up people, perhaps they might just have to steel themselves to take effective counter action. So if you're in court, answer questions with a liberal sprinkling of expletives: "Yes, your f+++ing worship, I understand the f+++ing question". How long would the court be tolerant? And in university tutorials, let decent speech activists similarly pollute academics' ears by profanity and obscenity. I warrant that faced with reality, judges and academics would quickly change their minds about the alleged public acceptance of obscene language.
Antonia
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 . Opinion
Building and using Internet communities to win in politics
By Richard J. Wood
 
Two recent articles in the journal Nature report that the explosive growth of traffic and sites on the Internet is creating patterns of usage that resemble other areas of natural development.
 
Given the unregulated and highly competitive environment in which the Internet is being developed, that should come as no surprise.  For example, it is noteworthy that millions of Internet users follow the "trunks" of major search engines and "branch" out to popular sites, which in turn lead users to smaller sites (new generation search engines use this model to determine ranking by site popularity).  That is also the blueprint for all living things.
 
Likewise, one can relate the Internet world to land development where communities are built along heavily trafficked areas and grow according to the demand and resources of their residents.  That is the blueprint for urban planning. Both perspectives appreciate the necessity of combining the inanimate framework of a structure with the free-flowing activity of living things that together form our world and our communities.
 
In the Internet world, the framework is a combination of hardware and software that establish things like domain names, web pages, links, databases and scripts.  The way people use that framework and the choices they make as a result (often measured as Internet traffic) is what makes the Internet closer to a living organism than a machine.  Together the framework and the users form Internet communities.
 
Understanding how such Internet communities develop is important to both political candidates and their parties. In fact, during the 2000 election cycle, it will be vital to using the Internet effectively. Since the typical campaign cycle lasts about a year and building Internet communities is a time-intensive process, candidates and parties will need to combine their own Internet projects with existing communities to reach the estimated 10 million Australians who will be on-line in 2000.
 
Building political Internet communities
Almost every serious federal, state and local candidate in 2000 will have some sort of Internet presence.  The most common will be an "official web site" where a campaign or party designs a framework to attract users and create an Internet community.
 
The following five principles serve as guidelines for developing effective political Internet communities.
 
Seed -- The first step in building an Internet community is to develop a plan, prepare the groundwork and allow the initial site to grow.  Choosing a domain name, designing a site, building "domain name id" and a establishing a network of links to the site are all beginning steps in creating an Internet community.  Each decision at this stage is very important because it establishes the framework for the community.  Like zoning a town or establishing a university, it requires both consideration of who will be using the community and how they will use it.  Identifying target audiences is a large part of this process.
 
Just as various parts of a body or city serve specific parts of the larger entity, so should parts of a political Internet community serve parts of the larger campaign or party.  For example, political Internet communities should serve candidates or officials (providing e-mail), staff (downloading speeches), donors (collecting and recognising contributions), supporters (posting directions to an event) media (posting press releases), voters (providing issue positions) and the general public (giving news and background information).
 
Cultivate -- After the framework is in place, considerable effort is needed to build the steady flow of visitors that make an Internet community.
 
While accessing a web site is as now almost as simple as dialling a telephone, it is no more likely that a web site will receive visitors just because it is on the Internet than it is to get telephone calls just because a phone is plugged into a jack in the wall.
 
Encouraging people to visit a site is a large part of the cultivation process.  Web site promotion must be done through both on-line and off-line advertising.  E-mail messages should be developed that tastefully invite people to the site and volunteers should be encouraged to send them out individually.  While Internet users are quick to protest spam (usually defined to include any e-mail they don't want) there are acceptable ways to utilise unsolicited e-mail. Off-line promotion can develop "domain name id" by promoting the site in traditional campaign advertising, on campaign literature and through word-of-mouth.
 
Nurture -- Internet communities are an excellent way to build the relationships needed for successful political efforts.
 
An effective political Internet community not only attracts new users, but also encourages them to visit the site regularly and establishes a sense of belonging.  This process requires time and effort by the candidate or party that maintains the site.  It is not realistic to expect voters to be motivated if their only contact with a candidate or party is the week before Election Day.
 
While political web sites can develop into on-line communities, they can also become "truck stops."  The difference between the two is that one provides a place where people interact on a regular basis and consider a part of their lives and the other is simply a source of materials or information that visitors pass through randomly and infrequently.
 
Creating an e-mail newsletter is an excellent way to engage visitors and build lasting relationships with them.  Use the newsletter to provide timely and helpful information.  For example, let supporters know about upcoming campaign events, speeches, neighbourhood walks, etc.  Give e-mail subscribers advance notice of such events or invite them to preview radio or TV commercials before they are broadcast.  Allowing users to contact the campaign or party through either direct e-mail links or form-generated e-mail is another way to nurture relationships.  Allocate adequate staff to respond to such e-mails promptly and treat Internet community members as well on-line as if they walked into the main office.
 
Weed - Community structures and systems need a process to eliminate outdated, unwanted or dangerous items.
 
The most basic example of this step is checking links on a political site.  While a link to a newspaper article may have been a good addition, it's not unusual for such a URL to later be used for something else or deleted.  Not updating links on a site is like sending traffic to a dead-end or a detour in the wrong direction.
 
Another good example of weeding is checking unmoderated discussion boards or guest books.  While it is important to encourage a free exchange of ideas, candidates and parties should monitor their sites to prevent the posting of incorrect or inappropriate material.
 
Likewise, it is a good idea to eliminate outdated information, such as directions to a fundraising event that has been completed or a challenge for debates after they have been scheduled.
 
Harvest - Effective use of political communities includes generating measurable results.
While some candidates and parties may be satisfied with simply having an Internet presence, politics is an industry where results are clearly measured in wins and losses.  Political Internet communities should be no different.
 
On-line fundraising is one of the easiest ways to measure a web site's success.  New technology that allows secure credit card contributions is a simple way to raise funds.  Comparing the amount spent on a community to the amount it raises (both on-line and in traditional fundraising) is one way to evaluate its success.  However, it would be a mistake to evaluate an Internet community solely by fundraising.
 
Using an Internet community to motivate voters in traditional get-out-the-vote efforts is also an important task.  Since Internet communities will most likely include users who are not local, it is important identify both actual voters and those who can contact local voters.  With the transient lifestyle of many Australians it is often surprisingly easy to identify personal and business contacts in particular districts.
 
Another way to utilise Internet communities is to recruit volunteers for both on-line and off-line campaign tasks.  For example, community members can recommend sites to other Internet users, attend campaign events or simply display bumper stickers.
 
Reaching other Internet communities
Although building effective Internet communities is vital to political campaigns and parties, it is not the only requirement for on-line campaigns.  Just as a campaign or party establishes an internal organisation and also needs a plan to reach and utilise other organisations, political Internet communities need to reach and utilise other Internet communities.
 
This has profound implications on Australian politics because the seamless integration of web sites on the Internet completely ignores the geographic boundaries that provide the foundation of politics in this country.  As a result, candidates and parties will need to utilise Internet communities that exist outside the boundaries where they have traditionally operated.
 
Especially in federal campaigns where candidates address issues of national or regional significance, it is important to make sure the campaigns and parties identify existing on-line communities that share their philosophies.  Allocating a portion of campaign budgets to reach these Internet communities will increasingly change the dynamics of political advertising.
 
Likewise, Internet users will find it easier to visit political Internet communities that cater to their specific interests.  For example, a voter concerned about environmental matters may search for candidates who have included the issue on their web sites.  That voter may then choose to contact, support or recommend candidates who share his/her philosophy on the issue.
 
However, it is also important for candidates and parties to recognise that the rights to free political speech will be rigorously tested by the Internet and its millions of new sites.  Understanding how and when to interact with other sites will be one of the important lessons of the 2000 election cycle.
 
For example, an attempt to purchase all domain names relating to a candidate is misguided.  Instead of attempting to control the medium, campaigns and parties should spend their efforts promoting their own messages and following discussions of their campaigns in other Internet communities.
 
While it is generally best to avoid engaging opposing points of view, countering false, libellous or malicious material is always a good idea.  When dealing with other Internet  communities, candidates and parties should also be careful to avoid federal election law violations by co-ordinating efforts with other communities.  Since this area is so new and regulations are still being developed, it is generally a good idea to follow accepted guidelines for dealing with print and broadcast media in this regard.  For example, providing campaign photos and press releases for use on other news sites is probably fine while telling a site's owner what to publish is not.
 
As the 2000 campaigns unfold amid a growing network of Internet communities, the candidates and parties that successful harness the power of these new social groups will have the advantage on Election Day.  Those who fail to do so will be relegated to the textbook examples of how not to react to new technology.
 
This article may be quoted with proper attribution to "Richard J. Wood, Queensland Campaign Director for the 'No' Case at the 1999 Republic Referendum".
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
5. Opinion:
The forgotten Christian holocaust

Today it is little known that the Nazis targeted not one, but three groups in Poland for annihilation: the Jews, the Slavs and the gypsies. All three were regarded as inferior races. After getting rid of them, the Nazis planned the elimination of Poland's elite, and the reducing of the rest of the Polish population to ignorant servitude. Every trace of Polish culture was to go.

Hitler's Viceroy in Poland said, "The Poles do not need universities or secondary schools; the Polish lands are to be changed into an intellectual desert." And so archives, museums, libraries, the press, publishing houses and art galleries were either destroyed or looted. (News Weekly, p.17. Book review of "The Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles under German Occupation 1939-1944 / Richard C. Lukas).

Poland's agony was harrowing. Out of a population of 20 million, by the end of the war almost 6 million Poles, half Jews and half Christians, were killed. The reviewer makes the interesting point that while Pope John XII is still criticised for alleged anti-Semitism for his silence over the treatment of Jews, few have noted that he was equally silent over the treatment of the mainly Roman Catholic Christian Poles. The Catholic Slavs suffered the same fate as the Jews.

The reviewer said, "The Jews of the Diaspora have made sure we know about their Holocaust, and don't forget it. But other actors and victims in that enormous conflict waged to the East and South East of Germany have not been served so well." Indeed. Lest we forget.

Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
6. Opinion:
A tribute to a gutsy Lady

I doubt it will be published but I sent the following letter to the Australian:
Though not a member of One Nation, I made a donation to Pauline Hanson's fighting fund. It seemed the least I could do for the woman who breached the wall of political correctness in this country. After her maiden speech there was an audible sigh of relief as people heard the taboo topics - immigration, economic rationalism, loss of sovereignty, Aboriginal affairs - mentioned at last.

And the result? An orgy of hatred from the politically correct. Hatred so intense it resulted in verbal abuse and even physical violence against the supporters of Hanson. Clothes were torn, people spat on, punched, even felled by thugs. The right to peaceful assembly was denied to Australians, many elderly, as potential supporters were forced to run gauntlets of screaming, hysterical protestors with hate-contorted faces. At Dandenong, Keith Warburton was bashed unconscious.

The media lapped it up and fuelled the hysteria with absurd headlines such as, "Cyclone Hanson endangers tourism" (WA, 12-13 / 10 / 96) and exactly a year later, "Coalition blames Keating, Hanson for loss of $ 2 bn ship deal." (WA, 11-12 / 10 / 97). Hanson was blamed for everything bar global warming and the spread of AIDS. The plethora of analyses by academics and journalists became ever more ludicrous and bizarre, clearly showing how utterly out-of-touch they were and are.

The Australia-Israel Review disgraced itself in publishing the names and suburbs of members of the party under the offensive and intimidating headline "Gotcha!", leaving them vulnerable to abuse and threats from cranks. The one respected charity, Community Aid Abroad, joined forces with B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission to form "Racewatch", panelled by three eminent people. They even re-defined 'racism' to include people who believe migrants to Australia should assimilate. As they didn't out even one 'racist', clearly the un-Australian stunt was intended to intimidate people.  The Victorian police also disgraced themselves by doing a deal with protestors to "allow"  people stranded in a hall surrounded by a baying mob to leave under escort if the meeting was cancelled. The police told Hanson not to attend. A very black day for democracy.

Australia has learned a lot about itself over the past four years since Pauline Hanson arrived on the scene, and what's been revealed is not very flattering. That a duly elected member of parliament was subjected to a constant stream of abuse, vilification, mockery, hounding, ridicule and worst of all, misrepresentation and censorship was a disgrace and the very opposite of the traditional Australian culture of the fair go.

She may not be educated. She may be a poor politician and have wrong policies. She may be stubborn as a mule, and put people offside. She may have attracted whackos along with ordinary voters disaffected with the major parties. But she has physical and moral courage and in that she puts most of her most rabid opponents to shame.

Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Opinion:
GST Business Destruction Starts.

The following series of letters have been forwarded to the News Report and have been repeated verbatim. The allegations contained in the letters are serious. An area of the Australian service economy, is being deliberately sacrificed by a deal concocted by the Liberals to be able to strike a deal with the Australian Democrats for the introduction of the GSY. As one of the writers makes clear is that he thought that the introduction of the GST was all about tax reform. I have to say I thought so too.
 
Here is a clear example of others agendas being surreptitiously put forward by those with political pull. What both Liberals and the Democrats are doing is in breach of their duties to the citizens of this country and should be exposed and ridiculed. Get to work contacting politicians and bureaucrats listed later and any other avenues that you think are appropriate.
 
The Editor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forwarded by Robert Balgarnie

LINQUIP AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT
Unit 6, 348 South Pine Road Telephone: (07) 3881 0686
Brendale Old 4500 Mobile: 0418 981 373
PO Box 5025 Facsimile: (07) 3881 0687
Brendale Old 4500 Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

17th March 2000

Mr Robert Balgarnie
The Long Plain Co.
PO Box 987
INVERELL NSW 2360

Dear Robert,

As a valued customer of ours, I should like to draw your attention to a recent political development that will affect our company, the livelihood of many Australians and possibly, your right to modify or improve your vehicle.

The Liberal Party agreed last year to an agenda put forward by the Democrats, in order for the Democrats to agree to allowing the G. S. T. legislation. Of particular concern to us is the new ruling by regulation (as opposed to legislation), that from July 1, 2000 all used diesel engines will become a prohibited import if they are for road use.

Imported engines that have a certificate of compliance with current Australian ADR Rules 30 and 70 would be exempt. This is however, theoretically and practically impossible as:-(A) most engines are imported from damaged vehicles and cannot be tested and (B) the customs department cannot specify what is a compliant certificate. In essence, probably 95% of present imports, whether for personal, commercial, road transport or farm use cannot comply.

The reasoning behind the Democrats agenda is that these imported engines significantly contribute to pollution levels within Australia in general. I believe that this particular reasoning is basically flawed, despite the apparent good intent, and I ask you to read the attached letter, forwarded to our Local Federal Members of Parliament. Please note that used imported vehicles fitted with diesel engines are exempt and also that petrol engines are also exempt.

I believe that the points raised in this letter are valid in their integrity and application and I urge you to contact your Local Federal Member of Parliament to voice your concerns should you agree. The GST is supposed to be about tax reform, not job losses.

The parliamentary process to allow possible rescinding of this new law expires on the 10th April 2000 (approximately). The jobs of not only our staff members, but also possibly thousands of people throughout the communities of Australia could depend on your support.

Please also read the attached copies of correspondence forwarded to Linquip by the M.T.A.Q. and the Diesel Engine Importers Association of Australia, and do not hesitate to contact me for further information.

I look forward to your support.

Yours Sincerely
Signed: Lindsay Cullen
Managing Director
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commonwealth department of TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL SERVICES
GPO Box 594, Canberra ACT 2601
Telephone (02) 6274 7111 Facsimile: (02) 8257 2505
www.dot.gov.au

Our Reference: L99/1602

Mr Tony Seimes
Executive Director
Motor Trades Association Queensland
PO Box 3359
SOUTH BRISBANE QLD 4101

Dear Mr Seimes,

I am writing to advise you of the introduction of a prohibited import regulation which will apply to used diesel engines designed for use in road vehicles, from 1 July 2000.

As a result of the Tax Package Agreement with the Australian Democrats, the Prime Minister announced details of amendments to "A New Tax System" on 28 May 1999. The amendments included a range of environmental proposals under the heading 'Measures for a Better Environment' (MBE). One of the environmental measures is to ensure that motor vehicles retrofitted with imported used diesel engines meet current Australian motor vehicle emission standards. The proposal stated that "the import of second hand diesel engines which fail to meet current emission standards will be prohibited". The full text of the Statement from the MBE is at attached for your information.

The importation of used diesel engines designed for use in road vehicles will be prohibited unless authority is obtained from the Minister for Transport and Regional Services or an authorised person of the Department of Transport and Regional Services.

Permission will be granted only if it can be demonstrated by means of a test report from a competent laboratory that each engine complies with current emission Australian Design Rules. At the time of commencement of the Regulation the current Rules are Australian Design Rule 30/00. Diesel Engine Exhaust Smoke Emission and Australian Design Rule 70/00 Exhaust Emission Control for Diesel Engined Vehicles. These requirements apply irrespective of the age of the engine.

It would be appreciated if you could inform your members of this new prohibited import regulation.

If you have any inquiries concerning the procedures and evidence required to demonstrate compliance with the above ADRs please contact Mr Mike Kimberlee on (02) 6274 7434

Yours sincerely

Signed: John McLucas
Assistance Secretary
Vehicle Safety Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31 January 2000
Banned used diesel imports
From: Ray Broughton - EKW (Member of Diesel Importers Association)

Firstly, thank you for your response.

We now have over 50 members for the Diesel Engine Importers association, and its still growing.

You may be competitors or mates, you may have your likes and dislikes in this industry, you may import a few diesels a year or 100's, you may only deal in Mack diesels, or you may be dealing in 4 cylinder Japanese. But one thing you all have in common is a desire to continue to run a legitimate business that you have built up over most likely many years. Our one and main aim at the moment must be to continue the importation of used diesel engines into Australia.

Like most of you I found it hard to believe that a Government could do this to an industry without any consultation or warning!

In talking with Adrian at National Truck Spares, we agreed that firstly we must
1. Inform everyone concerned
2. Get as many to join as a group (association) to fight this

Together with some of my staff we have spent the last 3 days sending faxes, emails and taking phone calls.

Just to take some pressure off us and the 5 other importers on our flyer, I am including a quick outline with some of the facts and some government department numbers that will give you some information.

Technically not all used diesels are banned. All used diesel engines that are out of a road vehicle are banned, unless each one is individually tested to the correct Australian design rules on emission (ADR 70/00) and smoke (ADR 30/00) and an import permit granted by the Transport and regional services.
This is in effect a ban on 95% of used diesel imports.

You should note that whilst machine diesels and marine diesel etc are still allowed into the country you can not import a diesel that has come out of a vehicle just because its intended use is on a pump etc. in Australia. So if it is not out of a machine or boat, it is banned.

Customs have stated that;

    a.. Complete engines are banned
    b.. Long engines are banned
    c.. Short engines are banned
    d.. Blocks are banned
You are all importers - check with your customs agent. The customs regulation is "Customs (Prohibited imports) amendment regulation 1999" Or Phone: Mr. Bill Henry from Customs on (02) 6275 6576

From the 1st of July no diesel engines can be imported into Australia without supplying a permit from the Commonwealth Department of Transport and regional Services (similar to that which currently applies to used vehicles). If you have any queries on how to get a permit phone Mr. Mike Kimberlee of Transport and Regional Services on (02) 6274 7434.

Where did this all start? As far as I have found out (from Michael Ferguson from RE Engines, who has been aware for some months) it started with a James Whelan from the Queensland Conservation Council, who took his desire to ban diesel engines to the Democrats Senator for Queensland Mr. Andrew Bartlett who took it to the Democrat party. During the G.S.T. negotiations between Prime Minister John Howard and leader of the Democrats Senator Meg Lees, diesel bans were brought up and the Liberals who at that stage would have agreed to just about anything, threw them in.

Senator Andrew Bartlett's Phone numbers are; Ph: QLD (07) 3252 7101. ACT (02) 6277 3406, Fax. Qld (07) 352 8957. ACT (02) 6277 3406

Although, unless you can give good reasons why the environment will not be harmed (and I think we can show that as efficient recyclers we overall have a positive effect on the environment) than I would not bother contacting him.

Leader of the Democrats Senator Meg Lees phone numbers are; Tele. (02) 6277 3991 Fax. (02) 6277 3996

The Minister (Liberal/National Government) in charge of this is Mr. John Anderson Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Transport and Regional Services Ph. (02) 6277 7680 Fax. (02) 6273 4126

In fairness to the Government this was not their idea rather it has been forced onto them by the Democrats. The other Minister that would have an interest is Senator Robert Hill who is the Minister for Environment and Heritage. His numbers are; Ph. (02) 6277 7640 Fax. (02) 6273 6101.

A good idea would also be to call your local M.P. Please advise any associated or interested parties, such as The Transport Association etc. of this problem.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
8. Life Sciences:
Global Boom in Organics
 
"Organic production is heading towards a global boom with annual growth rates worldwide predicted at between 20 and 30 per cent per annum." Why then bet on biotech and "put all our eggs in the one basket"?  Any investment advisor would council against that! We urge support and protection of the organic sector from cross contamination from GMO trials.

John Massey
Biohazard Action Alliance
=====================================================================

The US weekend magazine (the insert magazine for many Sunday papers all across the country) just published the results of a poll: 79% of Americans think there should be mandatory labelling for genetically altered foods.

======================================================================

MEDIA RELEASE
Industry to Focus on Organic Dairy Boom, 23 March, 2000

The first Australian Dairy Organics Forum to plan the expansion of organic dairy production will be held at the Royal Melbourne Showgrounds on Tuesday, 4 April.
The Dairy Organics Forum will bring together key players from production, processing, manufacturing and R&D to explore a national approach to issues such as policy development, organic standards certification, technical information and support, research and development and international trading opportunities.
The keynote speaker at the forum will be Patrick Holden, Director, National Soil Association, UK who will present a global view of the organic industry. Mr Holden is the leader of the largest organic certification organisation in the UK and has 25 years experience as an organic dairy, vegetable and cereal farmer.

The organic foods market worldwide is currently valued at $US 11 billion. It is expected to jump to $US 100 billion in 10 years, with a major share of the growth in some of Australia's key dairy markets like Japan and Korea.

"Limited production is the greatest impediment to Australia capturing a greater share of the rapidly expanding market for organic food," according to forum organiser Fiona Chambers. "In countries like Denmark, Austria, Sweden and Switzerland the consumption of organic products such as milk now make up 30-50% of market share.

"Dairy has been identified as one of the sectors with greatest potential for growth by RIRDC's Australian Organic Produce Research Program. But as yet there is no national approach to developing the organic dairy industry," she said.
Other speakers at the forum will include Libby Blackett-Smith, Australia's Trade Commissioner in Japan; Liz Clay, IFOAM World Board and Independent Certification Inspector; Scott Kinnear, Chairman of the Organic Federation of Australia and organic food retailer; and Audrey Schulz, Managing Director, Timboon Farmhouse Cheese which has been producing and selling biodynamic dairy products since 1972.
According to the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), organic production is heading towards a global boom with annual growth rates worldwide predicted at between 20 and 30 per cent per annum.
There are now approximately 8,000 organic farmers in Germany where the baby food sector is likely to soon become wholly organic. In Egypt organic produce has become mainstream. The biodynamic SEKEM initiative, employing about 1,000 people, delivers its products to 7,000 pharmacies and 2,000 shops.  And rapidly growing consumer demand is also reported from countries like Argentina and Poland.
For more information on the Dairy Organics Forum call Fiona Chambers on 03 5441 4821.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. b) Quotation:  Dr Michael Antoniou, Senior Lecturer in Molecular Pathology at a London teaching hospital says,
 
"The generation of genetically engineered plants and animals involves the random integration of artificial combinations of genetic material from unrelated species into the DNA of the host organism.  This procedure results in disruption of the genetic blueprint of the organism with totally unpredictable consequences. The unexpected production of toxic substances has now been observed in genetically engineered bacteria, yeast, plants, and animals with the problem remaining undetected until a major health hazard has arisen. Moreover, genetically engineered food or enzymatic food processing agents may produce an immediate effect or it could take years for full toxicity to come to light."
 
Articles Forwarded by
Veronica Griffin Ph.D..
Kerawa Qld.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
9. Feedback:
NZ Petrol Prices and Oil Companies
 
I saw this specimen on the news last night claiming a victory against the oil companies because he announced that the government would be looking into the prices and anti-competitive behaviour.  He is not happy they are acting like a monopoly.  Well excuse me?  Those that should be living in glass houses should not throw stones.  What about the governments decision to re-nationalise ACC?  Or does dear old Jim think a monopoly is okay, just as long as is it him in control of the aforementioned monopoly?
 
A further point about the price of petrol.  If Jim wanted the prices lower for the consumers, the take some of the petrol tax off.  Half of all the price of petrol (at the moment) is tax.  I don't see the politicians announcing that fact, or the media questioning the politicians on it either.
This letter is not supposed to infer that I like the price of petrol, or that I don't think the oil companies should bring the prices down.  It is just illustrating that it is not just their fault.  It is the fault of Jim and his cronies in a large part, and all the previous governments for imposing such draconian taxes on petrol, of which very little is spent on our third world roads.
Hamish Snowden
Forwarded by Dave Storage, NZ.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
10. Feedback
Subject: Australia - Guns
Some very interesting statistics. Learn from the mistakes of others; It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, a program costing the government more than $ 500 million dollars. And now the results are in:
  • Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent;
  • Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent;
  • Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent).
In the state of Victoria, homicides with firearms are up 300 percent. Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms (changed drastically in the past 12 months). There has been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly.

Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in "safety" has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in "ridding society of guns." Bet you won't see this data on the evening news or hear your governor or members of the state Assembly disseminating this information.

It's  time to state it plainly: Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws only affect the law-abiding citizens. Take note, Californians and other Americans, before it's too late!
Phillip Madsen
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
11. Feedback:
Free trade?
Tassie is digging in.....Tasmanian Agriculture Minister, David Llewellyn, says the Federal government has failed to negotiate effectively with the WTO. Peter Shelley at the Tasmanian Food Council agreed saying, "Tasmania has built a reputation for its clean, fresh and natural food. It's built that reputation on our ability to maintain disease-free status on a lot of areas in horticulture, agriculture and now aquaculture." (ABC's The World Today, 21 / 3 / 00)

An interesting constitutional argument may exist on this one. Section 51 that creates the power of the Commonwealth states that

51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:-

(x.) Fisheries in Australian waters beyond territorial limits:

The implication is that there is no Commonwealth power over State Fisheries. Of course this is where the external treaties power would comes in.  But this does show the danger and power of external treaties.

Another interesting (non applicable ) Constitutional section on water  is 100. The Commonwealth shall not, by any law or regulation of trade or commerce, abridge the right of a State or of the residents therein to the reasonable use of the waters of rivers for conservation or irrigation.

Regards
Kerry Spencer-Salt
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
12. Feedback:
GMO's & Telstra

I wish to inform you of two extremely important issues affecting rural communities Australia wide:-

Firstly the introduction of genetically modified organisms into Australia

  • GMO’s are not food, in fact are registered under the United States of America’s Food and Drug Administration as pesticides as they emit pesticide.
  • GM. seed cost more, and because the seeds have been patented, you are not permitted to keep seed for the following years crop, making the purchase of seed an annual event, the chemicals used to keep weeds and pests at bay cost more, as the GM seed does not keep all pests at bay.
  • Genetic material from GM seed can and do cross with other related plant life growing in your area, up to 2 km according to British research, making super weeds, that are resistant to pesticides - we already have trouble with weed control, unless your neighbours are willing to put in a concerted effort weed quickly get out of control, spraying poisons wholesale is not the answer, with spray drift now proven to affect / kill in the drift zone.
  • one of the most common myths of using GM seed is that we will be able to feed the starving of the world, people are starving because of a lack of money to purchase food. Africa, Ethiopia, and other countries export food to other countries , while their people die.
  • Round up ready seed actually does not use less chemicals as stated by the company, ordinary round up is not used (41% glosophosphate) the special GM round up is used, using more chemicals damage soil microbes (which feed the plants) with yield drags of up to 1/3.
  • GMO’s have not proven that they have the same nutritional value as their non GMO counterparts, they have proven however, that there are serious detrimental affects to the reproductive systems of insects, and animals who have been fed GMO’s in trials have produced cancers.
  • Our trading partners DO NOT WANT GMO’s.
  • Australia has a unique situation, using the U.S. GMO saturated stock pile of grain to our advantage, by staying CLEAN, this would give us farmers better commodity prices, as the world hungers for clean food, making farming more viable.
  • One only has to look at the dairy industry people are milking more cows using more fertilisers and mineral supplements to make the same money - but productions costs have soared - milkers in Victoria get 19.6 cents per litre once factory costs are deducted. Once the effects of de-regulation come into being the figure is expected to worsen .
  • Australia has GMO’s on the shelf UNLABELED they are contained in processed foodstuffs including baby formulas - companies do not want labelling because of the consumer back lash, the companies have the choice to put in GM ingredients, but it seems that they do not want the consumer to have the choice of purchasing GM free goods.
  • Lastly why produce GMO’s if no one wants to buy then, surely over 50 countries on our planet cannot be wrong - let Australia be smart - go GMO free and save our children from unproved promises of self interested companies, at least have a detailed investigation by scientists who do not have a vested interest. The average age of farmers in Australia is 68 !!!! one reason being you cannot afford to raise a family while producing food for everyone else, GMO’s are NOT the answer, I feel it will be the straw that breaks the farmers financial back.
My second point is the selling off of the remainder of Telstra.

Country Victoria will suffer if the rest of Telstra is sold off, we already have "ordinary" reception there are an enormous amount of "temporary" lines in Gippsland, no real infrastructure has been put into place, leaving the purchasers (share holders) footing the bill to fix this problem, or forgetting the problem. I recently had a second line installed, and had to pay double of the "special price" for city people, as I am considered "rural" even though the connection was less then 2 km away.

With little services like hospital, banking childcare, public transport, decent libraries, schools, or even television reception, I live an easy 3 hour drive from the centre of Melbourne not in outback Western Australia, a reliable telephone service is paramount.

I urge you to do some research on the two matters that I have brought up, please make an informed decision, and do not rely on the advise of people who stand to make money.

Yours faithfully,

Sue Macphail

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Let us know what you think. Feedback is important. Comments on articles read would be of value. Do you agree / disagree? Can you add more or a different perspective. Your contributions are greatly appreciated.
 
Send this email on to as many as you can. The more that read it the merrier. In time email communication will make government censorship impractical and the newspapers will have to start reporting it as it really is, rather than the smoke and mirrors tricks they currently indulge in, or loose readership, and therefore advertising monies. While we have a long way to go before that happens, each epic journey must start with a single step.
 
Lets go to it.

Neil Baird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Antonia Feitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Editorial Policy
If you wish to raise an issue without being identified as such, please make it clear that this is your wish, either by marking the correspondence Private & Confidential, in which case nothing will get printed, or by just stating that while the issue can be raised, your name is not to appear with it. Failing which all items received relating to the News Report are considered publishable (subject to a common sense test).
 
Disclaimer.
Opinions posted on the News Report are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the News Report or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Reply via email to