News Report Issue 68
Index
 
1. Thought for the day - Neil Baird
2. Request:
3. Opinion: Was globalisation really inevitable? - Antonia Feitz
4. Opinion: The Asianisation of Australia - Kerry Spencer Salt
5. Opinion: Naughty, Naughty - Antonia Feitz
6. Opinion: Oscar nominations show Hollywood nihilism - Don Feder
7. Opinion: The Winners - Antonia Feitz
8. Opinion: The Losers - Antonia Feitz
9. Opinion: Telstra's PR Shambles - Antonia Feitz
10. Opinion: When the bad guy is black - Larry Elder
11. Opinion: Our booming economy - Antonia Feitz
12. Life Sciences: a) Interstate canola crop scandal unfolds - Forwarded by Dr. Veronica Griffin
12. Life Sciences: b) Quotation: Dr. Peter Wills, theoretical biologist - Auckland University
13. Feedback: Longevity of research in biotech products - John Last
14. Feedback: A potential life save - Ron George
15. Feedback: Labors policy towards the ABC - Richard Woods
16. Feedback: Constitutional imbroglio - Kerry Spencer-Salt
17. Feedback: Inequity in the Queensland legal system - Colin
18. Feedback Contacts:
19. Editorial Policy:
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
1. Thoughts for the day:
 
"Lawyers and the law itself are more at home making and observing rules than exercising judgement" (Adrian Roden QC, 1989, from "The Cartel - Lawyers and their nine magic tricks" pp.82)
 
"If you don't have a dream, how are you going to make a dream come true?" (Graeme Fowler)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
2. Request:
For this online news report to be ultimately effective it must grow to such a size that it and the ideas it espouses can't be ignored. So do your bit and help circulate it far and wide. If we are to challenge the elites (the Packers and the Murdochs) view of history, politics, economics, the environment, the structure of society etc., then we are going to have to do more than wait. We are going to have to be very active and vigilant. We have given you one of the tools (information & a medium for comment) you will need. Help us to help you. Lets fan the flames of knowledge. Spread the word. Editor.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
3. Opinion:
Was globalisation really inevitable?

As we all know, Paul Keating is a University of NSW visiting professor of public policy. In that capacity he spoke at a UNSW alumni forum in Bangkok. He said protests against globalisation will continue until governments halt its impact on the poor and also halt the widening gap between the rich and the poor.

Now this is a bit rich seeing as it was the "Labor" Hawke-Keating governments that took off with globalisation in this country. Malcolm Fraser wanted to, but didn't have the ticker. And there's fat chance of any relief, simply because the fools running the show will brook no interference in the sacred mystical markets.

It's interesting too, that after all the "it's inevitable" tripe the media have been spouting for years, The Australian's international editor, Paul Kelly, wrote on the weekend, "Hawke and Keating weren't forced to open the Australian economy during the 1980s. As Keating says, "we could have sat it out and quietly governed" - and let the next generation deal with Australia's inexorable decline." (25-26/3/00).

Talk about re-writing history! Every person who has opposed the "globalisation is inevitable" line has been abused as a luddite,  a nostalgia freak, an economic troglodyte, scared of the future,  and so on. And now they turn 180 degrees in one day. It's Orwellian
 
Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
4. Opinion
Asianisation of Australia
 
My last email detailed how the Sydney Morning Herald has outlined the plan for the Asianisation of Australia. The SMH with confidence correctly stated (Spectrum - Saturday  March 18 2000 - ALL OUR TOMORROW's) that Indonesia and Australia are today part of the same global economic system. This ECONOMIC INTEGRATION is now accepted as a fact; the SMH forecasts future amalgamation into an Asian 'free trade' zone.

Ominously, the end result of economic integration will be that Australia is governed by Asia, through APEC, or a similar body; this will be AustralAsia. With this process the creation of the AustralAsia is to follow the standard formula that was used, by the New World Order planners, for the creation of the European Economic Community. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION FOLLOWED BY POLITICAL INTEGRATION

This makes a mockery of the republicans claim that a republic will provide Australia with an independent sovereignty and represents the creation of true nationhood. What a republic will do is provide an avenue for the transfer of sovereignty, as has occurred in England, into an economic regional control center. England is now ruled from Brussels and, in the same manner, Australia will be ruled from some a trade center in Asia (Singapore perhaps ?).

The above must totally change our understanding of the real purpose, meaning and effect of a republic. Asian integration can only come about AFTER the removal of Australia's current racial and political heritage, i.e. the Anglo Saxon Westminster System dominated by a Constitutional Crown.  Simply our legal and political integration with Britain must be removed before our political and legal integration with Asia. Thus our existing Constitutional links are the fortress from which the 'Heritage' culture must defend themselves; logically this fortress is the first point of attack for the internationalists. Yes Virginia, Malcolm Turnbull and Goldman Sachs were interested in more than just a people's republic.

Thus THE REPUBLIC IS NOW AUSTRALIA'S GREATEST RACE ISSUE. The question is whether the Australia Anglo Saxon people will allow a republic when it must mean the total annihilation of their cultural and legal ownership of Australian law. A republic will have exactly the same effect on Anglo Saxons as the landing of Captain James Cook had on the aborigines. The new invasion will transfer control to Asians. This is to say that the republic will be the demarcation point for the legal change of sovereignty to another race.

Kerry Spencer-Salt
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Opinion
Naughty, naughty!

Back in 1994, Jane Campion won an Oscar for the best *original* screenplay for her film, The Piano. It seems she's not really entitled to it
.

A book published 1920 called "The Story of a New Zealand River" by Jane Mander tells the story of a young woman who arrives for an arranged marriage to a dominating man living in a NZ timber settlement in the late 19th century. She has an 8 year old illegitimate daughter, loves her piano and falls in love with her husband's foreman who lives in the forest.

While Ms Campion's agent insists The Piano is an original screenplay, not many agree. The similarities are simply too many and too obvious.
 
Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
6. Opinion:
Oscar nominations show Hollywood's nihilism by Don Feder
 
AT THE ACADEMY AWARDS ceremony on Sunday evening, Hollywood will do what it does best --
celebrate itself. "American Beauty," nominated for eight Oscars this year, shows Hollywood's reigning ethos isn't liberalism as much as a pervasive nihilism that transcends left and right.
 
Politically, "American Beauty" is predictable. Its most sensitive, sympathetic character is a teen-age drug dealer. The least appealing is a retired Marine Corps colonel who beats his son (the pusher), turns his wife into a zombie, collects guns and Nazi memorabilia, raves about "fags" and has a secret crush on the lead character, played by Kevin Spacey. Now that's original.
 
"Beauty" also indulges Hollywood's passion for middle-class bashing -- portraying suburbia as a wasteland of soul-dead, sexually frustrated, status-obsessed losers.
 
Coming from a town whose more prominent citizens have homes that make the Taj Mahal look like a hovel and have gone through rehab almost as many times as they've been married, such moralising about spiritual impoverishment is rather droll.
 
But there's more to the movie than its unremitting Motion Picture Academy correctness. "American Beauty" is the highest expression of the cynicism, hopelessness and death of ideals that the entertainment industry calls entertainment.
 
The syndrome is analysed in a new book by Thomas Hibbs, a professor of medieval philosophy at Boston College, "Shows about Nothing -- Nihilism in Popular Culture from 'The Exorcist' to 'Seinfeld.'"
 
The author defines Nietzschean nihilism as "the moral state in which the highest values devalue themsel human aspirations shrink, and the great questions and elevating quests of previous ages no longer have any resonance in the human soul."
 
Hibbs observed that in "serious" films we increasingly encounter "an implacable and inexorable force, a malevolent power that prevents not only moral transformation and understanding but even escape."
 
"American Beauty" is a parable of the meaninglessness of existence. It opens with its anti-hero (Spacey) telling us he will be dead within a year, but that's irrelevant because, in a sense, he's dead already. In his closing monologue, he expresses gratitude for his "stupid, little life," which he's come to appreciate by accepting its utter wretchedness.
 
At the outset, Spacey's "stupid, little life" consists of a boring job, shrewish wife and sullen teen-age daughter. He has an epiphany when he falls for the latter's cheerleader friend.
 
Hibbs notes that Hollywood nihilism treats "traditional divisions of good and evil, and victims and assailants as mere conventions. Societal norms of right and wrong are obstacles to self-knowledge, obstacles that render us timid conformists. By contrast, anyone who breaks through the conventions attains a kind of clarity and resolve that most lack."
 
For Spacey's character, this clarity and resolve leads him to quit his job, devote himself to bodybuilding (to court his Lolita), get high as often as possible and buy the sports car of his dreams. Thus he achieves a salvation of sorts by reverting to a youth where his highest ambitions were carnal and chemical.
 
Even this transcendence isn't enough to save him from his inevitable fate -- to die violently at the end of the film. For "American Beauty," good is whim indulgence. Evil does not exist.
 
The dealer-next-door (who films dead birds because he finds them aesthetic) says the father who beats him is "a good man." In a universe without an ultimate source of values, there is no evil, only what is.
 
In the most popular book of the past year, "The Greatest Generation," Tom Brokaw speculates that the greatness of this generation was forged by the crucible of war and depression. Brokaw has it backward. It was the generation's values that allowed it to overcome the century's monumental challenges. (yet we are today being taught that values have no place in a rationalist economically driven society - Editor)
 
Today, many of Hollywood's most successful films argue that happiness is an illusion, striving is futile and values are a myth.
 
Among other culprits, the recent spate of school shooting has been blamed on cinematic violence. That's only part of the story.
 
When Hollywood continually tells impressionable adolescents that life is a hopeless, meaningless trap, is it so surprising that some choose to exit in a blaze of Wagnerian glory?
 
Don Feder
Jewish World Review
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
7. Opinion
The winners

In Australia, Jack has always been as good as his master, but increasingly our society is being class-ridden
. There has always been variation in people's wealth and fortunes, and that's as it should be in a free society where people vary in their intelligence, motivation, drive, energy, etc. But what's happening now is different. People are not being treated equally any more. Some are definitely more equal than others.

You see it in prominent people getting away with drink-driving charges. Kennett should have lost his licence once, but he didn't. Lady Renouf got off too. Perhaps it's always been so, and it's merely more blatant now. They don't care that people see there are two sets of rules.

Another example was the secret reservation of tickets for the Games so the elite didn't have to compete with the rabble. The latest example of the contempt for ordinary people was that ALL first release waterfront units at Walsh Bay in Sydney were bought by VIPs before they were opened for *public* inspection. All. They ranged in price from an el cheapo at $ 825,000 up to a cool $ 5.5 million.

Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
8. Opinion
And the losers

At the other end, people are now being brainwashed that casual and part-time work is 'fun'. The Olympic project manager for the recruitment company Adecco that is supplying labour for the army of waiters, ushers, newspaper sellers etc was spinning the line that it will be an exciting, "I was there" experience.

The working conditions don't sound much fun at all. For a start the normal shift will be 12 hours. That's 6 am to 6 pm, or whatever. Twelve hours makes a very long day. Overtime will commence after 12 hours and there's a 50 per cent chance of it being required. They want people who have the correct attitude, and we've already read about that last week. They don't want anybody to say, "G'day". Probably such naturalness doesn't demonstrate the right level of servility.

The managing director of another recruiting company said workers must be "people with the right mindset, people who say yes when others say no." Perhaps Neil might offer a green frog to anybody who knows what that means. Does it mean he wants doormats?

Antonia
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
9. Opinion
Telstra

They're not all that good on the PR front at Telstra
, are they. Ziggy obviously didn't see anything wrong in announcing job cuts of 10,000 in the same breath as a $2.1 billion profit. And the latest story shows the same thick hide.

Telstra sponsored a three day local government conference at Menindee, and installed a base station in the town. The locals were happy chappies - their mobiles worked. The bigwigs came to town - Premier Bob Carr plus ministers. The conference ended - and - and - Telstra pulled down the equipment and left town too! No more mobile phone access for a shire as big as Tasmania.

The mayor of the Central Darling shire couldn't believe it, saying it would have cost them as much to take it down as to put it up. Why didn't they just leave it? Telstra said a mobile service was not viable, and that the shire should seek government funds to provide a service.
Antonia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
10. Opinion:
When the bad guy is black by Larry Elder
 
THE DOUBLE STANDARD slaps you in the face.
 
Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania. Ronald Taylor, a black man, allegedly guns down five whites, killing three. What followed became a textbook case on how contemporary American journalism deals with race.
 
The suspect's motive could not have been more clear. A black neighbour quoted Taylor as saying, "I'm gonna kill all white people."
 
A white maintenance man described Taylor as disruptive ever since he moved into the apartment building, "Whenever he saw me, he'd call me a racist pig, or white trash, or he'd make a point of walking past me and brushing up against me. He just didn't like me."
 
Yet the media leaned over backward to avoid any appearance of racism. News anchors cautioned that we don't know whether Taylor's alleged hatred against whites was the "primary" or "sole" reason for the shootings. Pardon me. When did they add that requirement?
 
The Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act defines hate crime as: "Crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, colour, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person." No mention of hatred as a "sole" or "primary" motive.
 
Even the police issued mild, tentative statements about whether they considered Taylor's actions a hate crime. "There's a lot of hostility in this individual," said Wilkinsburg Police Chief Gerald Brewer, "so I think it's a little premature to simply define this as a racist event." A little premature?
 
In August 1999, white supremacist Buford Furrow gunned down several people at a Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles, and shot and killed a Filipino letter carrier. In the three days following the shooting, over 150 newspapers wrote nearly 200 articles about the slaughter.
 
On Nov. 11, 1999, in Kansas City, an Ethiopian man shot and killed two co-workers and wounded a third person. All the victims were white. The Ethiopian shooter, who also shot and killed himself, left a letter referring to "bloodsucker" whites. To date, how many newspapers carried a story about this apparent race-based shooting? Eleven.
 
The killing of Wyoming gay student Matthew Shephard brought screaming headlines and around-the-clock coverage. So did the dragging and killing of black Texan James Byrd. Jesse Jackson parachutes into Decatur, Ill., turning the expulsion of seven high school kids into a referendum on race.
 
Meanwhile, in Missouri, a car-jacker steals a car. He tries to push out a seat belt-strapped child, and drives at high speeds, with the boy bouncing to his death along the highway. In Michigan, a 6-year-old girl is shot and killed by a 6-year-old boy. In these cases, the media informs us much, much later that the bad guys are black. Were it the other way around, how long before Al Sharpton holds a press conference, with a sombre Kweisi Mfume of the NAACP by his side?
 
Atlanta Braves relief pitcher John Rocker shoots his mouth off to Sports Illustrated, and everyone from Jesse Jackson to Jesse James piles on. But the same gang seemed strangely AWOL in the case of Wilkinsburg, Penn.
 
Where's the sombre gathering of the "black leadership" demanding that Congress pass enhanced hate crime legislation? Where's the speech by President Clinton asking some blacks to cope with their pronounced and mostly unwarranted anti-white bias?
 
The double standard simply astonishes. George W. Bush must apologise for speaking at Bob Jones University, given the institution's anti-Catholic statements and policy against interracial dating. And on the question of the Confederate flag, the media filed story after story on the Republicans' response.
 
Yet the media allows Al Gore's black female campaign manager, Donna Brazile, to derisively refer to the Republicans as the "party of the white boys," while suggesting black Republicans J.C. Watts and Colin Powell (the general who commanded the United Nations army against Iraq in Operation Desert Storm - Editor) are Uncle Toms.
 
The media sits as both Al Gore and Hillary Rodham Clinton trek to Harlem and kiss the ring of the Reverend Al Sharpton, a David Duke (Leader of the KKK - Editor) in blackface.
 
Nevermind that Sharpton falsely accused a prosecutor of rape. Nevermind that Sharpton turned a dispute between a black tenant and a Jewish landlord into a racial riff. Stirred up by Sharpton's rantings, a black man set fire to the building in dispute, and then, shot and killed several minorities before turning the gun on himself. Nice work, Reverend.
 
Sooner or later, the mainstream media and the white-man-done-me-wrong black leadership must face the facts. Black / white interracial crime is almost entirely committed by blacks against whites. By ignoring this, and holding black criminals to a different standard, the media heightens tension and divisiveness (Unfortunately Intentionally; helps to sell papers - Editor).
 
The president's travelling Advisory Board on Race urged Americans to be candid with one another on race. Somebody tell the media.
 
Larry Elder
Jewish World Review
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
11. Opinion
Our booming economy

A relentless stream of propaganda from all the media daily assures us that Australia has a booming economy and that we are enjoying record prosperity
. It's so pervasive and confident we feel a bit guilty even thinking, let alone saying, "But what about the job losses? What about the retrenched skilled workers who are considered lucky to find casual and part-time jobs? Why do couples with young children both need to work? With no job security how can people plan for their future? How can young couples buy a house? How come a full third of men in their family-formative years are in poverty? How come some 700,000 children are in homes with nobody working?

Australia's booming economy is a lie. And nothing better illustrates it than the following story.  One of the new economy's successes, a 35 year old billionaire, saw his personal fortune drop $ 6 billion - yes billion! In a few hours of trading his company, Micro Strategy, dropped from being worth US$13.6 billion to US$3.8 billion. Is this real economic growth in the way most people understand the term? No, it's gambling pure and simple.

Fred Argy is under no illusions about what's happening in the economy:  "We are witnessing a dual economy at work across the world - in the real economy we have moderate to high unemployment, fierce competition in product markets, subdued wages, low product inflation, a decline in the range  and quality of public services, a squeeze of low income home-buyers out of inner areas, and growing inequalities in wealth and quality of life." (Australian Financial Review,  8 / 1 / 99).

That's the economy most people experience. It's a very different from the triumphalist trumpetings about Australia's record prosperity by the government and their media mates. Fred  Argy has also well described the other economy - the one the government brags  about. It's the one "where speculators - the new barbarians at the gates - want to  have fun making a quick buck." (7.30 Report, 26/4/95).

The cognitive dissonance shouldn't be so bad now.
 
Antonia
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
12. Life Sciences:
12. a) Subject: Interstate Canola Crop Scandal Unfolds 

Does anyone know about the GM sugarcane trials in the Innisfail or Ingham  regions?? 
While spending a few days at Hinchinbroook Island a few months ago, I overheard a conversation between two other guests at the table next to me about such trials to take place.  I pretended to be interested in the subject and one of the guys mentioned that he worked on a project between the CSIRO / DPI and one of the agri-chemical companies.  I could, of course not divulge who I was, just pretend that I thought it was all very interesting.  The conversation then changed to other subject and I had the distinct feeling that the guy smelled a rat and suspected that I may be a fellow scientist. Maybe I did not sound 'amateurish' enough.

If such trials are already on the way, it presents a grave danger to our cane industry, since sugarcane is a freely pollinating crop and pollen (a known allergy and asthma trigger) travel for many miles and can contaminate regular crops from unsuspecting farms in the district and beyond!
Veronica Griffin, Ph.D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tasmania at Risk as Interstate Canola Crop Scandal Unfolds
Sen B. Brown has alerted that his state is at risk from GMO crop trials, following the revelation that trials over the past three years in South Australia were done without the knowledge of the farmers who leased the fields, and that contaminated crops were disposed of in a public tip rather than being buried as required by the Code of Practice.

This of course rings warning bells for Queensland too, who have embraced biotechnology as no other, and funded the establishment of a Centre of Excellence in Biotechnology in SE Queensland. What credibility do the proponents have, that the assurances of conformity with applicable codes will be ensured, with such flagrant violations elsewhere in Australia?

We call for a moratorium on the construction of the massive IMB in residential St Lucia, until such time as adequate and "fool proof" regimes can be established to control the dangerous GM technology.
 
John Massey. W
Biohazard Action Alliance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. b) Quotation:  Dr Peter Wills, theoretical biologist at Auckland University writes:
 
"Genes encode proteins involved in the control of virtually all biological processes. By transferring genes across species barriers which have existed for aeons between species like humans and sheep we risk breaching natural thresholds against unexpected biological processes. For example, an incorrectly folded form of an ordinary cellular protein can under certain circumstances be replicative and give rise to infectious neurological disease".
 

Articles Forwarded by
Veronica Griffin Ph.D..
Kerawa Qld.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
13. Feedback:
Longevity of Research into Biotech Products
 
A reference for Antonia see the publication and the date this "problem" is mature technology it is too late to change as people have been eating this food for years.

Ref. National Geographic vol. 184 No.2 Aug 1993 Bacteria teach old bugs new tricks pp. 36-60

John Last
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
 
Feedback: 
A Potential Life Saver

A friend sent me this, and I'll pass it on.  Hope it's never needed, but if  it is, this might make the difference.  It certainly makes some sense.  Let's say it's 6:17 p.m. and you're driving home (alone of course) after  an  unusually hard day on the job.  Not only was the workload extraordinarily  heavy, you also had a disagreement with your boss, and no matter how hard you tried he just wouldn't see your side of the situation.  You're really upset and the more you think about it the more uptight you become.  All of a sudden you start experiencing severe pain in your chest that starts to radiate out into your arm and up into your jaw.

You are only about five miles from the hospital nearest your home, unfortunately you don't know if you'll be able to make it that far. What can you do?  You've been trained in CPR, but the guy that taught the course neglected to  tell you how to perform it on yourself.
Many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack.  What can you do?  Without help a person whose heart stops beating properly begins to feel  faint and has about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness. However,  these victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very  vigorously.  A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the chest.  A breath and a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without  let-up until help arrives, or until the heart is felt to be beating  normally again.
 
Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the  heart and keep the blood circulating.  The squeezing pressure on the heart  also helps it regain normal rhythm.  In this way, heart attack victims can  get to a phone and, between breaths, call for help. You'll be giving  yourself CPR with this technique.  Tell as many other people as possible about this, it could save their  lives!  The above was taken from Health Cares, Rochester General Hospital via  Chapter 240

Ron George
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Feedback:
Labors Policy towards the ABC
 
27 March 2000
 
The Editor, Toowoomba Chronicle
PO Box 40, Toowomba Qld 4350
 
Dear Sir
 
Labor must reveal its secret agenda on the ABC to the Australian people. Labor's demand today for a full Senate review of the ABC Act is an open admission that Labor wants to change the Act.  Otherwise why review it?
 
Kim Beazley must say what is wrong with the Act now, what he wants to change and why.  Mr Beazley must explain why Australians shouldn't fear this review as yet another Labor attack on ABC independence.
 
Labor has a long track record of pontificating about "safeguarding the independence of the ABC" while stacking the Board with trade union mates and former Labor Premiers. Now the party's communications spokesman Stephen Smith is at it again.  He today claimed that "the independence of the ABC…goes to the heart of my concern" – this is rubbish.
 
Mr Smith is demanding a full Senate inquiry into "the role of the ABC in the future, the role of the ABC in the digital world".  He specifically stated that Labor wants to review the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983, especially "the viability and relevance of the Act into the future".
Why?  Tell us what you want to do to the ABC.
 
Labor keeps accusing the Government of all sorts of weird conspiracy theories about the ABC.  Labor remains the only political party to have released an official policy of direct intervention in ABC internal affairs – the 1998 communications policy says Labor will direct the ABC Board where to spend funds.
 
Yours sincerely.
Richard Wood
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Feedback
Constitutional Imbroglio
 
  1. 14. John Richard Hugo stated that "our Governments are bereft of any semblance of constitutional authority." The reason is that "Her Majesty's" Letters Patents were signed by Australian politicians and not by the Queen.

    While I cannot give a complete answer to the implications of all that John states it is necessary to clear up a number of falsities in the arguments presented.

    John states,

    1.. It is stated that " We (the royal we) revoke the Letters Patent dated 29 October 1900". Now the real Queen and Her staff would know that the Letters Patent of Queen Victoria were no longer valid at Her death, so why revoke something that had no legal authority?

    The reality
    .

    Letters Patent do not go invalid on the death of a Monarch. They are signed by the Monarch, but carry the authority of the Crown or Throne. The constitutional doctrine is that the Throne can never be empty as there is always a need for a source of power to run the government of the country.

    The absurdity of John's position can be seen in light of the structure of the British Empire. On the death of a Monarch the first job of the incoming Monarch would be to issue new Letters Patents to all the dominion governors.  And before this time the whole of the dominion government would be without valid power.

    In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Levick [1999] FCA 1580 (1 December 1999) the following was stated, "27 The office of Governor-General was constituted by Letters Patent of Queen Victoria dated 29 October 1900. They are to be found, as revised in 1904 in Statutory Rules 1901-1927,  Vol IV, p 3622. Clause 7 of the Letters Patent was amended in 1911 and again in 1921. The amendment is not of present relevance.

    Under the Letters Patent which are stated to be intended to be "permanent" and not to be replaced each time a new Governor-General is appointed, Her Majesty declared that there should be a Governor-General to be appointed by Commission. The Letters Patent provided that they could be revoked or amended by a successor to her Majesty, that is to say the office itself survived the death of the sovereign.... the letters patent governing the office continue...  notwithstanding either the retirement, removal or death of a Governor-General or the death of the sovereign."

    Before there is the normal cry of "BUT THIS IS ONLY THE WORDS OF THE CORRUPT COURTS PROTECTING THEIR POLITICAL MATES" let me say that this is entirely consistent with the noted constitutional scholars like Chitty and Anson.

    John states,

    2.. It states that all concerned should make the Oath or Affirmation according to that which is in the "constitution". That is made to a Monarch "under the Crown of Great Britain and Ireland". The Crown of Great Britain and Ireland became extinct when Ireland was granted her independence in 1922.

    The reality.

    This is, for practical purposes, merely a play on words. The courts will not strike down the continuation of the Constitution on a technicality of a name. They look to the substance and not the from. Clearly the Crown of the United Kingdom is still there and it binds us. It is no different today as Scotland goes for independence
  2. Once again think of the Constitutional havoc in all the dominions as the Crown that binds them becomes extinct from a political change in Great Britain.

    Kerry Spencer-Salt
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Feedback:
Inequity in the Queensland Legal System
 
Neil, the simple answer is that the Supreme Court is a corrupt Court. There is no way in equity that One Nation is not entitled to be registered, and If the Supreme Court had constituted itself in accordance with its jurisdiction statute in equity, there is no way this amount can be charged against Pauline.

The corruption lies in the constitution of the court contrary  to the Acts which govern its makeup.

In equity, that which is supposed to be done is deemed to be done.  An equitable decision is that 400,000 plus Queenslanders voted for a Party, and by their vote, One Nation, in equity is legitimate.  One judges vote cannot count for more than 400,000.  Some cases, "Orr V Ford 1988 High Court."  Equity entitles the party to its vote money.   The fraud is the Queensland Government welching upon its publicly enacted obligation to pay a certain amount for every vote counted.
 
A Federal law, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as Schedule 2 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986, and the statement of this undeniable fact as a recital,  that it binds the State of Queensland in the front of the Anti Discrimination Act 1991  is an estoppal on the State of Queensland recovering the money from One Nation.  Let the dogs try to pursue bankruptcy as a way to recover the money. It is then a federal matter, and Section  28 Crimes Act 1914 which guarantees political freedom to all Australians  may be used against anyone who would issue a bankruptcy notice.

Pauline and others were  mere trustees of that money, and cannot be held personally liable except upon a jury verdict, by the Trusts Act 1973.

This is not private and may be published anywhere under the protection of Section 45 Criminal Code (Q) and Section 24F Crimes Act 1914.

Regards.
Colin
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Let us know what you think. Feedback is important. Comments on articles read would be of value. Do you agree / disagree? Can you add more or a different perspective. Your contributions are greatly appreciated.
 
Send this email on to as many as you can. The more that read it the merrier. In time email communication will make government censorship impractical and the newspapers will have to start reporting it as it really is, rather than the smoke and mirrors tricks they currently indulge in, or loose readership, and therefore advertising monies. While we have a long way to go before that happens, each epic journey must start with a single step.
 
Lets go to it.

Neil Baird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Antonia Feitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
Editorial Policy
If you wish to raise an issue without being identified as such, please make it clear that this is your wish, either by marking the correspondence Private & Confidential, in which case nothing will get printed, or by just stating that while the issue can be raised, your name is not to appear with it. Failing which all items received relating to the News Report are considered publishable (subject to a common sense test).
 
Disclaimer.
Opinions posted on the News Report are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the News Report or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Reply via email to