NATIONAL WATCHMAN UPDATE No 9. Vol 2. DATE : 17 February 2001 SUBJECT : Joosse’s Josh Judged : Janus Faced Bringing you step by step to an understanding of the coming New World Order and associated One World Government. Yes, there is time to prepare but you must listen to The National Watchman. ============================================= INTRODUCTION ============= A recent UPDATE brought you face to face with Joosse’s Josh. This is an argument, like the Murphy Myth, that the Australian government is invalid. The reason is that the Queen of Australia cannot exist as a legal entity and thus the Letter Patents 1984 are not valid and so the Governor General has no power. Hence all laws enacted by him are void. Such claims cannot be dismissed out of hand. It was said of the Murphy Myth, by one of the reviewing judges, that there is oft a small distinction between the spurious and the profound. Ultimately Jossee’s legal argument must be evaluated and a verdict passed; the review process has now started on this new mythological constitutional theory. Following is the text from a Queensland newspaper (No further details available as I have an improperly referenced source) of about the 14 th February. It details that one Terry Sharples is presently using Joossee’s Josh, in a Supreme Court attempt, to terminate the current Queensland elections. It will be an interesting verdict. SHARPLE’S LAW ============== Normally, there would be little more that can be said of an Australian citizen acting responsibly to have his understandings validated by the court system. But there may be much more to this then meets the eye. To understand the true implications we must recap information from the previous UPDATE. A) Mr Joosse was one of the foundation philosophers of the Murphy Myth. b) One the ‘central proponent’ of the Murphy Myth, and perhaps the strongest, claims to be a senior policy advisor to the Minister for Energy and Minerals, a consultant to the Prime Minister’s Office and to talk regularly the Australian Minister of Industrial Relations over the dinner table. In this manner the Murphy Myth can be linked to the political party system. C) The same above ‘central proponent’, in an open letter in Exposure Magazine (Nov-Dec 2000), was asked to confirm whether he was the Secretary of the Balnarring Branch of the Liberal Party and asked as to his part in the break up of State Electricity (Vic). There has been no reply; the implication of this is to further the link of these constitutional theories to political parties and a globalist agenda. ENTER SHARPLE’S LAW =================== It is now reasonable to entertain the distinct possibility that the Murphy Myth was implemented at the most senior levels within the Liberal Party. While it is not possible to be certain of the party's involvement it is possible re-create the ‘conduit of information flow’ from the Party to the Murphy Myth protagonists. One of the conduits leads directly into the office of the Prime Minister! Thus in conjecture we must ask, “Why would the Liberal Party sponsor constitutional misinformation? ” REPUBLICIAN POLITICS =================== Please remember that this information has lead to calls for international peace keeping troops to be brought into Australia! It can be said that this is totally consistent with the political parties'globalist agenda, albeit implemented in a clandestine fashion. So it is possible to conjecture that the political party system, unable to destroy our Constitution in a republic, has embarked on the backup - ‘Plan B’. And this brings us to Sharples’ law; Mr Sharples we are informed is, “The man who brought One Nation to its knees”. Mr Sharples, in a previous challenge, was the man that had One Nation de-registered. The reader, I am sure, would not hesitate to label this a highly charged political law case. Its result was highly supportive of the current political system and the collusiveness of the major parties. Today, Mr Sharples uses Joosse’s Joss. In this manner, Jossee's Joss, like the Murphy Myth can be linked to the support of the political party system. But to this end there is a simpler method to demonstate a political agenda. My original set of information on Joosse's Josh came from the Australia Independence Party (P.O. Box 2759, Seaford VIC 3198). It appears that they are using it as a central plank in a politcial push. Political parties pushing law is tainted with a level of high farce bordering on hyprocrisy. Should Joosse be involved with this party it severely discredits the merits and legitimacy of his legal position. Law must be separate to politics. This was something well understood by those that created our fine Constition for they embedded a 'separation of powers' within it. Today the political party system seeks to remove the Constitution and again integrate power; this is a move towards dictatorship. WORDS WORTH REPEATING ====================== The words of the recent National Watchman Update are worth repeating; they end this UPDATE. “Global government, which the political parties now works towards, implies a new sovereign for Australia. Yet complete sovereignty does not rest in law but in THE HEARTS OF THE PEOPLE. The Murphy Myth, and now associated delusions, can be seen as part of a formidable campaign by globalist forces to convince loyal Australians that their existing constitution is invalid. This removes from the people’s hearts the will to defend the old constitution upon the proclamation of global sovereignty. To finish I simply return to the words of Alan Gourley. "The first step to creating a new set of social beliefs is to create a confusion of beliefs....So, when faced with confusion, we normally believe what we want to believe... The hooks in the public mind are scientifically set". The salient points in the above are very bright stars in a very dark sky. It should not take the three wise men to use them as a guide to the true workings and machinations of our politicial system. Kerry Spencer-Salt B.E., LL.B (Hons) The National Watchman Australian Community Organisation P.O. Box 136, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Phone : (02) 9 690 2211 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website : www.rockroll.com.au/watchman ============================================ Reluctant litigant returns to court Byron Vale The man who brought One Nation to its knees and whose latest legal challenge would bring the State to a standstill wishes be bad never started his court battles. In 1999 Terry Sharples, accountant, former One Nation candidate and sell-trained lawyer, successfully applied to have the party reregistered. Now he wants the upcoming state election stopped on the grounds the Queensland Governor had no right to issue the election writ because his appointment was invalid If he is successful, every action by Queensland Governor would be void, including political and judicial appointments dating to 1987. The application s suffered a setback this when Supreme Court Justice Ambrose refused to abort Saturday’s selection, however the matter is expected to be finalised next week. “I am not saying he would not succeed but I believe his argument is unlikely to succeed”, Justice Ambrose said in court. But Mr. Sharples said his current action was as strong as his case against One Nation. Mr Sharples said he “stumbled” on this legal challenge while researching options from the One Nation case. He claimed the powers of the Queensland governor were altered by an act in 1987 which was illegal because a referendum was not held on the proposed changes "That's what they're all worried about, they know I’m right I'm not trying to be a smart arse”. he said. "If I am correct all the cost orders against will be dispelled as well." Mr Sharples said his legal fights had been financially devastating. He has not worked full-time for two and a half years, he regularly commutes from his Gold Coast home and the Brisbane Courts, he has spent $ 4000 on photocopying and he estimates he faces more than $ 100,000 in court costs. Mr Sharples married with three children said he was cynical ol the justice system. "You can get pretty bitter and twisted because the court system doesn't deliver practical justice," he said "They generally treat me as a joke, quite unfairly". ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/public-list@neither.org
