Dear Deborah,
Suing individuals like bank managers for minor offences is
allowed by the banks and judges huff and puff and pretend they are doing
right. However, the issues I have raised (Contract Fraud and Money
Creation) are major offences which will bring the banks down from their position
of dominance to one of servitude. This the banks will not allow and the
judges do as they are told.
The Constitutional Problem is one that will not go away.
While people are starting to use it, the judges again are doing what they
are told and rejecting the arguments. Nobody is yet winning on those
grounds - and will not - until the judges are pushed aside and juries come into
their own. This is what should have been and should always be --- and
there we have the battle lines drawn.
It is a question of sovereignty, ie: who rules who. Are
the people sovereign or slaves?
The fight can only take place in the Courts because the enemy
have all the guns.
If the people are prevented from securing justice in the
Courts, then there will be, as Henry Lawson described, "blood on the
wattle" and the whole nation of Australia will be destroyed.
As for the Principality of Caledonia - I would rather see the
people rally to the Flag of the Union Jack and the Southern Cross. But, if
the Principality of Caledonia serves the cause of Right and Justice to defeat
what exists at the moment, then go for it.
Joe Bryant is also doing his best with the
Alternative Three campaign. His target is a strengthened Australia on the
same foundations which we supposedly already have. This is a better ideal
and, if given a chance, would gain better acceptance than a Lilliputian
project.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
|
- Re: Question John Wilson
- Re: Question John Wilson
- Re: Question John Wilson