Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied.

[John Wilson]

Dear Wolter,   Gaudron J (+ Callinan J) dismissed my application for leave to appeal against Hidden J's denial of trial by jury.   Toohey J (+ Kirby & Dawsson JJ) dismissed my application for leave to appeal against Supreme Court of NSW's Master Greenwood's ruling that a variable rate of interest "is indeed certain".   John. -----Original Message----- From: Wolter Joosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cyberjustice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, 18 May 2001 22:03 Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied. Allow me to quote the High court of Australia:             “If the courts of common law do not uphold the rights of the individuals by granting effective remedies, they invite anarchy, for nothing breeds social disorder as quickly as the sense of injustice which is apt to be generated by the unlawful invasion of a person’s rights, particular when the invader is a government official” (Gaudron, Toohey JJ, Plenty v Dillon &Ors HCA\91) Kindest regards, Wolter Joosse ----- Original Message ----- From: John Wilson To: Cyberjustice Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied. Dear John,   I am not using barristers or solicitors.  The one time I did, they not only failed to represent me they supported the judge's contention that Magna Carta was "obsolete". I sacked them on leaving the court. They are incompetent and cowardly.   Trial by Jury is guarantied by many charters and statutes.  Under the imperial Acts Application Act, anyone (eg: judges) who offends against an Imperial enactment is liable to 5 years imprisonment - and the trial must be by jury.  5 years for each offence against all of those Imperial enactments amounts to a long, long time in jail.   That is the Law and that is Justice.   The judges have nowhere to hide.   Trial by Jury is the single most important issue in history because, without it, there is tyranny and tyranny leads to war.   So, it doesn't matter which court a "freeman" is faced with,  the right to trial by jury is his.   Yours sincerely,   John Wilson.      -----Original Message----- From: Cyberjustice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 18:06 Subject: Re: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied. Hi we are suing a barrister and lawyer in the Victorian County Court and currently have a Jury. They the lawyers we are suing are fighting tooth and nail to have the matter struck out and or have the jury removed. Check out www.cyberjustice.com.au Regards John Tuczynski ----- Original Message ----- From: John Wilson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: (((mayday-announce))) Trial by Jury denied = Justice denied. Dear M1,   Without Trial by Jury, no individual or group will achieve anything.   A Court consists of a Judge and a Jury - and, if a Judge is employed by any party in the proceedings, the Jury are sole judges of every "part and parcel" of the case.   On Thursday 19th July, 2001 at the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Queen's Square, Sydney, NSW, Australia, a single Judge will hear a Notice of Motion to deny Trial by Jury in the matter of John Wilson -v- St. George Bank Limited & State of New South Wales.   The issues in the case are Bank Fraud (contracts involving variable interest rates are void, under Common Law, because of uncertainty + banks create money "out of thin air") and Judicial Corruption (Judges from the Supreme Court to the High Court conceal Bank Fraud).  Therefore, the conspiracy between Banks and Judges is proven.   That is why Judges, unlawfully and maliciously, deny Trial by Jury.   Absolutely any cause, including Globalization, can only be determined by the People in the form of Juries in Courts.   However,  Judges deny Trial by Jury.   Thursday, 19th July, 2001 9:30 am in Macquarie Street, Sydney at Queen's Square.   What is M1's position?  Will M1 defend the Right of Trial by Jury?   Yours sincerely,   John Wilson.