Giovanni,

On Jun 13, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
Licence: yes i agree, it will be added to the sitemap extention much
like it happens in microformats already.
if you want to use RDF i believe this is what you're looking for
http://validator.creativecommons.org/

yes, especially for LOD. In our case, we'll have to provide means of restriction and even billing (when SemWIQ gets integrated into Grid middleware - our requirement is a middleware for virtual data integration in the Grid). However, because I want SemWIQ being as generic as possible and also usable as a general data integration middleware, I want to re-use as much as possible and build on standards to be compatible to LOD/WOD.

Statistics:

i'd tend to see this use case as a low level one that concerns
implementation of distributed sparql (an interesting aspect however!).

sure. That's why I would extend voiD and maybe even Scuvo [1] for my purposes.


It seems strange at least to ask people to write some triples to say
how many triples they have when a sparql endpoint is there just to
answer you any query you might want?

that's why I said, it's just because of performance.
At the moment my DataSourceMonitor uses a { [] a rdfs:Class } query to get classes of a dataset and then it iterates over classes to fetch instance statistics: count (*) where { [] a c_i } - this can be done remotely. However, for good cost-based optimization I need histograms for any class/property[/range] combination. RDFStats will run directly (and "nice") at a SPARQL endpoint to generate such histograms - at least in my case. Query federation for >20 public SPARQL endpoints is not feasible anyway with acceptable performance if you have many joins.



Sorry for the late answer,
Andy

[1] http://sw.joanneum.at/scovo/schema.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Langegger
Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing
Johannes Kepler University Linz
A-4040 Linz, Altenberger Straße 69
http://www.langegger.at


Reply via email to