Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Ian Davis wrote:
I wonder if we could highlight those doing a great job in this space
more, e.g. I believe Opera's foaf output is LOD
Ian,
There are other LOD compliant FOAF spaces should we want to venture down
this path.
Personally, I think FOAF should have it's own cloud. This cloud should
be connected LOD and then be exposed in two ways:
1. via the current FOAF node (i.e. when clicked)
2. it's own cloud diagram
Links:
1. http://esw.w3.org/topic/FoafSites
Yep, I think in some ways a FOAF 'blob' in the LOD diagram is misleading.
FOAF I think is rather a vocabulary element present in many of the
datasets and documents being linked. Dublin Core, SIOC, DOAP etc too.
There is also a notion of a 'FOAF document' but this is pretty informal.
What would be interesting (very very interesting) would be to have
metrics for the % of documents, sources etc that have graph structures
matching some common SPARQL patterns. For FOAF and for other vocabs. A
lot of folk would find this very useful I'm sure...
cheers,
Dan
