I started a discussion on this topic (http://groups.google.com/group/open-guid-discussion/browse_thread/thread/0bbc190aa80287d8) to avoid polluting this list with the sordid details. The goal is to maximize linkage and minimize duplication and pollution with obtuse inferencing concepts.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Announcing Open GUID From: Kingsley Idehen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, September 25, 2008 1:15 pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yes, I have not loaded DBPedia yet. I started with WordNet 3.0, which > apparently did not deem IBM as a part of our language (note Mircosoft > and Google do make the cut!). See the (http://openguid.net/roadmap) for > more details on the data loading initiative. Once that is complete, if > your favorite (least favorite?) company is still not loaded, anyone will > be able to add it, tag it, and add identical references. > > And yes, the function was to find you an existing Open GUID based on > some text. I will try to make that clearer. > > Thanks for the test drive, > Jason > Jason, Yes, I see some data now [1]. How are you planning to proceed re. data from UMBEL, Yago, OpenCyc, and DBpedia? Links: 1. http://demo.openlinksw.com/proxy/html/http://openguid.net/e6adf4e8-da25-102b-9a03-2db401e887ec Kingsley
