Amy Stephen wrote:
This could degenerate into a religious argument in short order. There is simply no way to specifically regulate conversation without throttling knowledge. Since this list is primarily focused on the enabling the free flow of knowledge, it seems a counterproductive move.

If the list continues to focus on purpose and data and technologies and protocols and standards, and people try really, really hard to avoid self promotion of any variety as much as possible, and remember to be considerate of and trust one another, then things work.

In the final analysis, cooperation and trust are our only hope for just about anything.
Amen!

Kingsley


On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Kingsley Idehen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:


    David Wood wrote:

        On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

            Ian Davis wrote:

                Hi all,

                I'm not aware of any official policy on commercial
                posts to this list, but usual mailing list etiquette
                generally recommends that postings about commercial
                services and products should indicate their nature and
                give some indication of cost. I think this is even
                more important when the mailing list is focussed on a
                project with an "open" or "free" theme. Obviously, as
                I represent a vendor my preference is to allow
                commercial postings but I would also prefer that they
                are clearly labelled as such. Is this a policy that
                other members would like to see made explicit?

                Ian

            Ian there is no know policy for product announcements or
            job postings or anything else. I think we just
            collectively focus on on relevance. I think the relevance
            to Linked Data is simply what matters.



        I agree, for what that is worth.  Clear identification of
        commercial content is certainly appreciated, though.  Even
        better would be identification capable of being filtered on.

        Regards,
        Dave



    Dave,

    So provide a template to clarify your suggestion. Ambiguity
    doesn't solve anything bar leaving grounds for subjective innuendo.

    Lets be as clear as possible since this is how objectivity is
    established.

    Also, for what it's worth, what is "commercial content" ?


--

    Regards,

    Kingsley Idehen       Weblog:
    http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
    <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
    President & CEO OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com








--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com





Reply via email to