Hi Simon,
Thanks for the comments.
I have changed the XSLT to use void:uriRegexPattern
Can you explain why you prefer sioc:has_container to dcterms:isPartOf ?
Keith
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:07 -0000, Simon Reinhardt
<[email protected]> wrote:
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
We are very pleased to announce the release of voiD [1].
Congratulations!
My comments:
-
<http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/source/browse/trunk/liftSSM/SSM2void.xslt>
uses void:uriPattern instead of void:uriRegexPattern and so does the
example output under
<http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_4_3_Publishing_tools>.
I really like the addition of void:uriRegexPattern!
- I'm not so sure about the correctness of the usage of dcterms:format
under
<http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_1_5_Technical_description_features>.
First, dcterms:format requires a resources rather than a literal. Then,
this would mean that the void:TechnicalFeature *has* this format, so it
would be a document, not that it *is* that format. How about:
:DBpedia void:feature <http://dbpedia.org/resource/RDF/XML> .
- My questions on
<http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still
stand. ;-)
- I hope there will be some alignment with SIOC in the future (see also
<http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev/browse_thread/thread/da8a2d4c1f4adf38/07370433943f906d?show_docid=07370433943f906d>).
What I'm especially after is using sioc:has_container instead of
dcterms:isPartOf to go from the page of an item in the dataset to the
description of the dataset (which would be a sioc:Container as well).
I think I will just do this for now (for the project I'm working on)
since I'm providing discovery via sitemap.xml anyway.
Cheers,
Simon
