On 2/9/09 12:30 PM, Semantics-ProjectParadigm wrote:
Dear Kingsley,
We talked with Sybase, and they are not DBMS platform dependent, but
moving.towards a mobile and wireless corporate business services
support model.
My comments were in the context of Sybase being an RDBMS.
Installing Sybase on Amazon EC2 is no different from installing Oracle
or Virtuoso, they are DBMS engines hosted by a virtual computer in the
Cloud.
Second, we agree that they and Sun lack for now most of the
functionality we are looking for, but they are willing to talk and
collaborate to a very large extent, to explore new avenues.
Sun doesn't lack functionality, I just meant that re. Cloud coherence,
Sun hasn't pushed to make DevPay AMIs an option for OpenSolaris, so
Linux is the only option in this regard at the current time.
I totally agree with you on cloud computing in combination with linked
data technologies providing solutions.
But most of the potential users out there would not understand an iota
of the basics of semantic web technology.
I haven't said anything about "semantic web technology". In short, I
rarely use the buzz-phrase "Semantic Web" :-)
They want the functionality right now on their Android powered (Google
and other Open Handset Alliance brand) phones, Eclipse platform based
mobile devices, netbooks, notebooks, iPhones, Blackberries, 3G GSM
phones etc.
We'll if you want to deal with "Unified Storage" courtesy of the cloud,
you comeback to my point about Linked Data and Cloud Computing. I am
simply saying that you could do the following:
1. Instantiate a computing resource in the Cloud
2. Log in and receive a User ID by the system
3. Point to wherever you have data (Web, Enterprise, your own desktop etc..)
4. After 1-3 you have access to your data from wherever, just pick a
relevant standard, and that will be available. You only need to remember
you ID/Name.
For mobiles this mean SyncML for Calendar and AddressBook data or
HTTP/WebDAV.
In my daily work I deal with specialists and non-specialists alike and
the most telling sign in the use of the internet is that the internet
access is taking place at an increasing rate by people on the move,
requiring sophisticated solutions.
E.g. someone working in the rain forest (a pharmaceutical industry
scout, geologist, conservationist, biologist, reporter, park ranger)
will want to digitally acquire data, upload it somewhere and have it
processed into predefined data sets, which can then "by Live Update"
be retrieved from the repository used by his company or institute by
some "cloud computing" component, processed and the reference
information of the updated linked data published on some internet
cloud for linked data, and possibly the linked data itself residing
somewhere on the web itself too!.
Coincidentally, my earlier link to Alon's presentation (Data Spaces)
demonstrated how he did some dog-fooding using a similar usecase.
My biggest challenge (clearly) is getting people to reconcile what they
want and how they want it, with what has been available for a long time
based on industry standards re. our products.
Make a specific use case, and I can give you a very specific usage
example, if need be.
I have taken the time to check out just about every company or
institute of which there are subscribers to these w3 lists, and the
products and services they provide.
Lots of good stuff out there, but the numbers of users who may want
something else cannot be ignored.
I don't disagree with that view point.
There are approximately 1,000,000 non-profits worldwide dedicated to
sustainable development and the environment, of these maybe 25,000 may
have the resources to consider Virtuoso or other products, most
however don't and will only be willing to consider FREE open access,
open source, or cloud computing solutions, where they may be willing
to pay subscriptions and some Premium Services.
The above is quite confusing to me for the following reasons:
1. Virtuoso is available in Open Source and Closed Source variants
2. The Virtuoso AMI offering is all about the subscription model you
describe
In short, you see my problem? You've described Virtuoso functionality
but pitched it as contrary to what Virtuoso offers.
And I do not think that in academic circles money is available in
abundance either.
I guess our collaborations with academic doesn't imply they are our
prime customer target.
For the next two years the non-profit sector, or civil society at
large and the services sector are going to be in the driver's seat,
determining the fate of a lot of new emerging technologies in the
field of internet services and mobile computing.
Yes, and so will a lot of emerging technology be determining the fates
of these institutions. Everything is Linked! :-)
The reason being that both industry/economic sectors are very large in
the developed, industrial countries, resilient and relatively
recession proof and will need to "rationalize" operations even more in
these lean times.
Preaching to choir :-)
Kingsley
Companies like Microsoft, IBM, Google, Yahoo etc. may need to adjust
to these new realities.
Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
www.rainbowwarriors.net
Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for
sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide
www.projectparadigm.info
NGO-Opensource: Creating ICT tools for NGOs worldwide for Project Paradigm
www.ngo-opensource.org
MetaPortal: providing online access to web sites and repositories of
data and information for sustainable development
www.metaportal.info
SemanticWebSoftware, part of NGO-Opensource to enable SW technologies
in the Metaportal project
www.semanticwebsoftware.info
--- On *Mon, 2/9/09, Kingsley Idehen /<[email protected]>/* wrote:
From: Kingsley Idehen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Semantic Web pneumonia and the Linked Data flu (was:
Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?)
To: [email protected]
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Yves Raimond"
<[email protected]>, "semantic-web" <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, February 9, 2009, 4:49 PM
On 2/9/09 11:33 AM, Semantics-ProjectParadigm wrote:
>
> For the storage and cloud computing I have found that e.g. Sun
MicroSystems and Sybase are willing to listen to all ideas about
open source
reference architectures and cloud computing, including for the semantic web.
At the current time, I can't make a DevPay AMI for Solaris on Amazon EC2.
As for Sybase, I don't see why DBMS specificity offers any form of clarity
re. Cloud Computing which is ultimately about using the cloud to virtualize
computing resources (machine, os, dbms, and apps as components).
Cloud Computing makes "Data as a Service" by way of virtual
machinery.
Linked Data makes "Data as a Service" viable through the use of
de-referencable URIs as mechanism for Attribution and brand management.
Collectively, Cloud Computing and Linked Data offer a solution to:
1. "Sweat& Brow" conundrum of yore re. publishing databases
2. Tedium associated with publishing databases or knowledgebases - example
DBpedia, Bio2Rdf, NeuroCommons, and MusicBrainz could each be assembled for
immediate use in 1.5hrs or less
compared to an error prone 16 - 22hr odyssey.
The incentive to publish/expose data in Linked Data form -- for any entity
--
is inextricably bound to the fundamental reason for being part of the World
Wide
Web in the first place i.e. to discover and be discovered with increasing
degrees of serendipity.
Links:
1. http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/VirtuosoEC2AMI
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
