Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
The only reason to mint resolvable URIs is to allow fetching of a description

i'd say that minting in other's people spaces is really calling for
troubles and should be discouraged? one should, could, possibly put
"sameas" if some URI exists somewhere else.
+1

I though we all collectively accepted the norm Giovanni iterates above?

Of course you can save records (triples) in a Quad / Triple store with whatever URIs you choose, but at deployment time best you use URIs associated with your own Data Space and then owl:sameAs to the source. Basically, this is the pattern I wrote about when we started releasing DBpedia, NeuroCommons, Bio2Rdf, and MBZ to EC2. In all of these cases the de-referencable URIs exist in the instance owner's data space bound namespace thereby localizing the de-referencing tasks.
honestly? i dont even see the reasonw hy to copy this data on dogfood!
the entire point about semanti cweb is to be able to use data that's
distributed.
Yep.
copying will only create wrong duplicates once you change a bit of the
data, e.g. correct the spelling of my last name in the page.
Yep.
if its one source, then fine, the source is changed and its indexed
again if it has been copied.. everybody loses, i'd say :-)

Yes, "Data Access by Reference" is about not having to interact with "Data by Value" which requires localization of data in order to actually use the values :-)


Kingsley

Giovanni

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Knud Hinnerk Möller
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi again,

On 19.03.2009, at 14:58, Tom Heath wrote:

Hi Knud :)

2009/3/19 Knud Hinnerk Möller <[email protected]>:
Hi Tom,

great stuff, and nice you're using some of our swc vocabulary!
Once a <http://data.semanticweb.org/ns/swc/ontology#DogfoodTsar>
always a <http://data.semanticweb.org/ns/swc/ontology#DogfoodTsar> ;)
It's an unliftable curse!


I'd love to
import the data into the dog food site - the more data we have there, the
better. However, as your data is at the moment, only the people would
show
up as resources on our site, since everything else is in the ldow
namespace.
Good point!

Do you think you could generate an xml file as described in [1]? That
would
make the import task easiest and would generate RDF that integrates
nicely
with the rest of the dataset!
No sign of [1] in your mail, but I think I follow you. So am I ok to
modify my script to mint URIs in the following namespace?
http://data.semanticweb.org/workshop/ldow/2009/
ooops... [1] was supposed to point to
http://data.semanticweb.org/documentation/user/faq#how_to_add

You are absolutely ok to mint URIs in the dogfood namespace, as long as we
manage to get the data into the site afterwards! The easiest way might be to
produce the XML files as outlined in [1] (this time the link is really
there! ;), but we should also manage to get it to work by adding the right
triples in your RDFa. I should write up a list of triples that are necessary
for the dogfood UI to make sense of the data - everything can be loaded, but
not everything displays nicely at the moment.

One comment about the modelling. You say:

<http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/papers/ldow2009_paper11.pdf> a
swrc:InProceedings .

Would it not be nicer to have a separate URI for the paper and then link
to
the pdf? E.g.:

<http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/papers/ldow2009_paper11> a
swrc:InProceedings .
<http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/papers/ldow2009_paper11> swrc:url
<http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/papers/ldow2009_paper11.pdf> .

What do you think?
Yes, good point, this would make good sense. I'll make these
improvements when I have a spare moment.
Very cool.

Before I spend too long on
that though, are there plans that you or anyone else knows about to
RDFize the data about all WWW2009 workshops etc? Would be a shame to
duplicate effort, though providing it at source does have a lot of
appeal.
I just asked Daniel Schwabe if he knew if we could repeat the process from
last year (take EasyChair data, convert with our script) for the main
conference data. Let's see what comes out of that. I don't know anything
about the workshops, though. I'd say there are three possibilities at the
moment (in increasing order of effort involved):

1.) If you use EasyChair, take the data from there and convert with existing
script. You need access to the XML output of EasyChair, though.
2.) send me the data in XML as per [1], so that I can convert it with the
same script.
3.) generate the RDF yourself. That will probably need some iterations to
get it right (or I will have to make the dogfood URI more robust!)

Incidentally, I think there are some errors in
<http://data.semanticweb.org/workshop/LDOW/2008/rdf>. AFAICR there are
no hasAcronym and completeGraph properties in SWC.
ouch, you spotted my vocabulary hacking there... those two properties are
additions I came up with, which are unfortunately not yet reflected in the
vocabulary source online. I'll correct that asap.

Cheers,
Knud

Cheers,

Tom.



On 18.03.2009, at 18:03, Tom Heath wrote:

Hi all,

In the name of eating our own dog food, information about the upcoming
LDOW2009 workshop at WWW2009 is now being published as Linked Data.
Basically the workshop site [1] now contains a reasonable amount of
RDFa about papers, PC members and chairs, with links between LDOW2009
authors, chairs and PC members and their corresponding entries in the
SW Conference Corpus [2].

There is plenty more data that could be exposed, but I think this is a
reasonable start. If you want to see the data in other forms, you can
use the RDFa Distiller [3], to get e.g. RDF/XML [4].

Knud, if you're listening, would it be possible to get this data into
the SW Conference Corpus (and then maybe updated later if we publish
more)? Presumably this would ensure that links to authors not already
in the corpus would no longer 404.

For the record, the main workshop Web page is generated by a hacky
little PHP script that reads a data file; this script is now enhanced
to generate RDFa and links to the SW Conference Corpus. If people are
interested I can clean the code up and release it under some open
license; it makes an easy way to generate a workshop Web site that
does Linked Data out of the box.

Cheers,

Tom.

[1] http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/
[2] http://data.semanticweb.org/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/
[4]

http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fevents.linkeddata.org%2Fldow2009%2F&format=pretty-xml&warnings=false&parser=lax&host=xhtml&space-preserve=true&submit=Go!


2009/3/17 Chris Bizer <[email protected]>:
Hi all,



we  are happy to announce that the papers of this year’s Linked Data on
the
Web workshop are online now and can be accessed at



http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2009/



Looking at the program, we think that LDOW2009 is going to be again a
exciting event.



Congratulations to the authors and lots of thanks to the members of the
LDOW
program committee for all their tough reviewing work!



We are looking forward to see you in Madrid.



Cheers,



Chris Bizer, Tom Heath, Tim Berners-Lee, Kingsley Idehen

(LDOW 2009 Organizing Committee)





Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com

shared innovationTM

Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be
those
of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email
message
and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage
of
the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient,
then
please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this
e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.

Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and
is
registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights
Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________


--
Dr Tom Heath
Researcher
Platform Division
Talis Information Ltd
T: 0870 400 5000
W: http://www.talis.com/
-------------------------------------------------
Knud Möller, MA
+353 - 91 - 495086
Smile Group: http://smile.deri.ie
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
 National University of Ireland, Galway
Institiúid Taighde na Fiontraíochta Digití
 Ollscoil na hÉireann, Gaillimh

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com
shared innovationTM

Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be
those
of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email
message
and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of
the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then
please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this
e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.

Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is
registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights
Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit

http://www.messagelabs.com/email______________________________________________________________________


--
Dr Tom Heath
Researcher
Platform Division
Talis Information Ltd
T: 0870 400 5000
W: http://www.talis.com/
-------------------------------------------------
Knud Möller, MA
+353 - 91 - 495086
Smile Group: http://smile.deri.ie
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
 National University of Ireland, Galway
Institiúid Taighde na Fiontraíochta Digití
 Ollscoil na hÉireann, Gaillimh








--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com





Reply via email to