Hi all:
>By the way, any chance of asserting that a gr:BusinessEntity is
equivalent to a foaf:Organisation or foaf:Agent?
As a statement in a particular data space, I think such a link is pretty
accurate and useful. However, we currently prefer to collate such
"heuristics"-based mapping axioms in separate files instead of including
them in the vocabulary specification. The reason is that some users of
GoodRelations manage clean OWL DL models inside corporate applications;
there, importing, or linking to, RDF schema elements has unwanted
side-effects.
Don't get me wrong: We are very interested and collecting practically
useful link statements. But I think they should be managed in a modular
fashion.
Best
Martin
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
<gr:BusinessEntity rdf:ID="BusinessEntity">
...
<owl:sameAs
rdf:resource="http://www.3kbo.com/people/richard.hancock/foaf.rdf#i"/>
...
</gr:BusinessEntity>
By the way, any chance of asserting that a gr:BusinessEntity is
equivalent to a foaf:Organisation or foaf:Agent?
begin:vcard
fn:Martin Hepp
n:Hepp;Martin
org:Bundeswehr University Munich;E-Business and Web Science Research Group
adr:;;Werner-Heisenberg-Web 39;Neubiberg;;D-85577;Germany
email;internet:mh...@computer.org
tel;work:+49 89 6004 4217
tel;pager:skype: mfhepp
url:http://www.heppnetz.de
version:2.1
end:vcard
