> > > It is hard to accept their goals so far since they made up a new > vocabulary for RDFa instead of matching the FOAF support that > SearchMonkey gives, and the URI's they provide for don't contain valid > top level domain names when the RDFa properties are joined with the > prefixes so it looks a little weird when you actually serialise it to > RDF.
What it looks like to me is they started with hcard, went off, implemented support for that, along the way discovered rdfa, thought "Neat! I bet I could do a vcard in this!" and ended up here. It feels like a 20% project which isn't quite up to the usual standard, and they've given these guys a bit of free reign to play with the idea. I'd prefer to assume innocent intentions and fumbling rather than malicious intent.
