John Goodwin wrote:
Hi,
Over the weekend I created a little semantic web map mesh-up using (amongst
others) BBC and Ordnance Survey data:
http://www.johngoodwin.me.uk/boundaries/meshup.html
I also blogged about it:
http://johngoodwin225.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/mash-ups-are-so-last-year/
John
.
This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may
contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied,
distributed or disclosed to any other person.
Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the writer
and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can any contract
be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve the right to
monitor emails and attachments without prior notice.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Ordnance Survey
Romsey Road
Southampton SO16 4GU
Tel: 08456 050505
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk
John,
Pretty cool!
Now to make it a real "meshup" you have ensure the paths to the raw data
are part of the HTML that presents the Linked Data :-) Thus, I should be
able to use any Linked Data aware user agent against your data source
when seeking to make additional mashups.
I would suggest following (one of options):
1. Use <link/> to expose the URIs for Bedford, Birmingham etc..
2. RDFa in the HTML instead of <link/> re. URI exposure
3. Atom/RSS feed that exposes URIs for each place or URIs for RDF docs
(info. resources) that contain Metadata describing the places
4. Content Negotiation (should you have deployment server privileges).
Another nice thing about your demo is that is is gound zero for
distinguishing between a "Meshup" and "Mashup". If the routes to data
source URIs aren't explicitly exposed or discernable by the
representation used for the presentation, then we have a "Mashup" :-)
Back to you.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
