Sent from my mobile, which insists on top posting
On 25 Jun 2009, at 12:16, Toby Inkster <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:59 +0200, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
However many "newbies" to RDF and ontologies are confused by this,
because the triple
foaf:Agent foaf:holdsAccount foaf:OnlineAccount .
is actually not contained in the ontology.
What needs to be communicated is that:
[ a foaf:Agent ] foaf:holdsAccount [ a foaf:OnlineAccount ] .
instead. Those triples are not actually in the ontology itself
+1
I was writing a similar reply, but Toby beat me to it (and did a fancy
diagram).
In my experience the issue is conveying the implication of the schema.
Damian
