On 9 Jul 2009, at 07:44, Juan Sequeda wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Hugh Glaser <[email protected]> wrote:
Mind you, it does mean that you should make sure that you don't
put too many
LD URIs in one document.
If dbpedia decided to represent all the RDF in one document, and
then use
hash URIs, it would be somewhat problematic.
Could you explain why???
The very practical problem of file sizes.
Your hash URIs can of course be distributed across a collection of
files. e.g.
http://example.com/~alice/foaf.rdf#me
http://example.com/~bob/foaf.rdf#me
http://example.com/~carol/foaf.rdf#me
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[email protected]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
