Hugh Glaser wrote:
Excellent Alan, thank you for pointing this out, both as a general point and 
the specific case.
I had puzzled over the equivalences, since they seemed implausible (just given 
the number), but not worked out why (I guess the lack of the backlink did not 
help).
However they, along with good stuff, came from a source I chose to trust, and 
so I went with it.
The caveat is useful in general - I know of other sameas that I might consider 
erroneous/dubious but are widely accepted.
Another example would be the sameas between the opencyc URIs and the dbpedia 
ones, although things of different type, which was a topic of discussion on 
this list a while ago.
Hugh,

Yes, the links between OpenCyc and DBpedia are an issue.

Larry/David: did you receive the mail (private) that I sent a while back about this?

[SNIP]

--


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com





Reply via email to