Danny Ayers wrote:
> 2009/11/14 Simon Reinhardt <[email protected]>:
>
>> I definitely think it's useful for Linked Data purposes, just like
>> owl:sameAs, IFPs and everything that Allemand and Hendler describe as
>> RDFS-Plus (although they don't include owl:differentFrom in that).
>
> Yeah, certainly worth investigating - an owl:differentFrom is also a
> link after all. By definition it's likely to go to data that you don't
> actually want, but probably the best way of dealing with that is
> figure out what's needed to get it...then do the opposite.
>
did a provisional check by querying the sparql endpoint at
lod.openlinksw.com :
owl:differentFrom = 25 { http://bit.ly/1rnLEw }
owl:sameAs = 59,745,648 { http://bit.ly/14FdEE }
regards
