Story Henry wrote: > On 20 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> Nathan, >> >> That sort of reminds me of something [1] ;) >> >> So, I asked a round a bit [2] and the answer essentially was: go register >> one ... fancy doing it together? > > The latest document draft-nottingham is here btw > > http://cidr-report.org/ietf/idref/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/ > > One could just register it by adding the relation in the acl ontology such as > > acl:rules a rdf:Property; > rdf:domain foaf:Document; > rdf:range foaf:Document; > ... > > As you can see in the 5.5 examples, you can have a rel value as a URL. ( So > in this it is similar to > atom). The only disadvantage then is that you don't get the nice shorthand, > for inclusion in Atom XML, > and other documents.
Yup that's what I went for too :) Link: </.wac/everyone.n3>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#";; title="Access Control File" > So I suppose the best would be to add the relation first to the ontology, > work out a good wording > for it, test it out, then ask for the IETF shorthand, the put an owl:sameAs > link to the ietf one, which > hopefully we can then convince them to serve up as linked data. related discussion for those hunting the archives: http://markmail.org/thread/h26pwafhr6suzvm4 > I'd be happy to support a document for the link. It seems to me the Atom > folks could find that very > useful. Not sure yet how cold they are towards rdf still. Likewise (if the input is needed) Best, Nathan
