On 1 Jul 2010, at 17:38, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I have loads and loads of code, both open source and commercial that assumes
throughout that a node in a subject position is not a literal, and a node in a
predicate position is a URI node.
On 7/1/2010 8:46 AM, Henry Story wrote:
but is that really correct? Because bnodes can be names for literals, and so
you really do have
literals in subject positions.... No?
It is really correct that I have loads and loads of such code.
This code conforms with the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax
Recommendation 2004
Jeremy
