Hi, > I agree with Pat in that case, that it would just be easier not to put > restrictions > in the abstract rdf syntax at all, instead of complicating things all over > the place. > There are pragmatic reasons why sentences such as > > <http://bblfish.net/#hjs> "name" "Henry" . > > are not going to be successful, the main one being that it is impossible to > adjudicate what the relation "name" refers to is about.
In that respect, "name" is not different than any URI one has never seen before. What about adding "name" rdfs:subPropertyOf foaf:name . to this example? Best Bernhard
