Hi Vasiliy,
Am 20.07.2010 14:39, schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Bob Ferris wrote:
The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple
xsd:int based datatype property.
Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]?
Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property
was made exactly for such statements.
Good question, however, when I read through the description of
rdf:value[1], I found also:
"..the principle that such simple values are often insufficient to
adequately describe these values is an important one. In a global
environment such as the Web, it is generally not safe to make the
assumption that anyone accessing a property value will understand the
units being used.."
How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the type
xsd:Integer? I think with the current definition:
co:count
rdf:type rdf:Property , owl:FunctionalProperty ;
rdfs:comment "Links a counter resource to the actual count"@en ;
rdfs:domain co:Counter ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy co: ;
rdfs:label "has count"@en ;
rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
vs:term_status "stable"@en .
it works.
Cheers,
Bob
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue
