Mike Kelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote:
Ian Davis wrote:
Hi all,
To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my
blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary
Here is the URI of a toucan:
http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
Ian, where's the demo of /toucan#frag so everybody can see that you can use
200 OK *and* keep the graph clean? will you give it fair air time in the
(non-)debate? will you show us a comparison of the two and benefits of each?
does this break the web and if so, how?
Of course it doesn't break the web, anybody who says that being HTTP
friendly breaks the web is clearly wrong.
Wrong question, correct question is "if I 200 OK will people think this is a
document", to which the answer is yes. You're toucan is a :Document.
That assertion would be wrong if the response contained a
Content-Location header pointing to the specific document resource.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/154
