On 11/5/10 11:12 AM, Ian Davis wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray<[email protected]> wrote:
httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI with
a 303 MAY be a NIR.
Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, in
the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is contradicted
by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the URI.
Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean.
Ian
For everyone else: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defeasible_reasoning :-)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
