On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:05:09 +0000
Phil Archer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wrote a short blog entry-like piece last night [1]. My basic point
> being that I agree wholly with Ian's analysis but disagree with his
> conclusions and I argue the case for a new HTTP status code.
I also had that thought. Instead of:
200 OK
We'd have:
250 This Might Do
I created a test script to play around with this idea a few days ago,
then promptly forgot all about it.
http://examples.tobyinkster.co.uk/test-status-codes.cgi/250/This%20Might%20Do
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[email protected]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
