On 11/24/10 8:29 AM, William Waites wrote:
... on the plus side, Friedrich wrote:
] * Lots of coolness, sucking up to linked data people.
I don't see these as particularly good things in themselves. The
solutions have to be obviously technically sound and convenient to
use. Drinking the kool-aid is not helpful.
* [2010-11-24 08:05:08 -0500] Kingsley Idehen<[email protected]> écrit:
]
] Is your data available as a dump?
UK data for 2009 that I made is available at:
http://semantic.ckan.net/dataset/cra/2009/dump.nt.bz2
http://semantic.ckan.net/dataset/cra/2009/dump.nq.bz2
But this was done more or less by hand and repurposing the CSV ->
SDMX (this was done before QB became best practice) scripts is not
easy. Still, from a modeling perspective they might be a good starting
point.
But having to ask a question in the right place and the answer being a
good starting point is maybe different from doing a google search and
finding easy to follow recipes that can immediately plugged into some
web app.
Cheers,
-w
William,
What does MySQL 4 do with this data that can't be done with a moderately
capable RDF quad / triplestore?
If I am going to run rings around this thing, I need a starting point :-)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
